8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467

alisenchung · 2025-07-25T00:25:01Z

This issue is responsible for updating the translations of all the localize(able) resources in the JDK since the previous L10n drop.

Progress

Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

JDK-8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Justin Lu (@justin-curtis-lu - Committer)
Naoto Sato (@naotoj - Reviewer)
Damon Nguyen (@DamonGuy - Committer)
Alexey Semenyuk (@alexeysemenyukoracle - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26467/head:pull/26467
$ git checkout pull/26467

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26467
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26467/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26467

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26467

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26467.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

bridgekeeper · 2025-07-25T00:25:36Z

👋 Welcome back achung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

openjdk · 2025-07-25T00:25:38Z

@alisenchung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update

Reviewed-by: jlu, naoto, dnguyen, asemenyuk

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the master branch:

70ebb5e: 8364019: Add alignment precondition to Universe::reserve_heap
b4028c9: 8362482: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java: System.gc() does not provide full GC
08b0b34: 8361715: (bf) Improve java/nio/Buffer/GetChars.java and migrate to JUnit
... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/971ea23c95764e11ed234f657eb28ba7c51862c5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

openjdk · 2025-07-25T00:26:22Z

@alisenchung The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

compiler
core-libs
javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

mlbridge · 2025-07-25T00:29:13Z

Webrevs

00: Full (f1daee3f)

justin-curtis-lu

Looks good. The JBS issue will need to be set as a P2 to be eligible for backport to 25.

justin-curtis-lu · 2025-07-25T16:23:22Z

src/jdk.jpackage/share/classes/jdk/jpackage/internal/resources/MainResources_de.properties

@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ MSG_BundlerFailed=Fehler: Bundler "{1}" ({0}) konnte kein Package generieren
 MSG_BundlerConfigException=Bundler {0} aufgrund eines Konfigurationsproblems übersprungen: {1} \nEmpfehlung zur Behebung: {2}
 MSG_BundlerConfigExceptionNoAdvice=Bundler {0} aufgrund eines Konfigurationsproblems übersprungen: {1}
 MSG_BundlerRuntimeException=Bundler {0} nicht erfolgreich. Grund: {1}
-MSG_BundlerFailed=Fehler: Bundler "{1}" ({0}) konnte kein Package generieren


Even though there was no change in the original, it looks like they removed this entry because it was a duplicate. We should consider filing a separate issue to have the duplicate removed in the original as well.

@justin-curtis-lu the issue has been filed and resolved already - JDK-8361697

Thanks, I missed that.

justin-curtis-lu · 2025-07-25T16:31:50Z

src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/launcher_de.properties

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ launcher.err.main.not.void=Methode "main" ist nicht mit Rückgabetyp "void" dekl
 launcher.err.cant.find.class=Klasse nicht gefunden: {0}

 # 0: string
-launcher.err.cant.find.main.method=Konnte keine main(String[])- oder main()-Methode in der Klasse: {0} finden.


As we discussed, even though we used this suggestion last drop, the translation team rejected the translation.

alexeysemenyukoracle · 2025-07-28T16:19:33Z

jpackage changes look good

alisenchung · 2025-07-30T01:53:32Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2025-07-30T01:54:54Z

Going to push as commit c671089.
Since your change was applied there have been 43 commits pushed to the master branch:

3488f53: 8364150: RISC-V: Leftover for JDK-8343430 removing old trampoline call
330ee87: 8360163: Replace hard-coded checks with AOTRuntimeSetup and AOTSafeClassInitializer
d5d311f: 8361873: [GCC static analyzer] exec_md.c forkedChildProcess potential double 'close' of file descriptor '3'
... and 40 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/971ea23c95764e11ed234f657eb28ba7c51862c5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

openjdk · 2025-07-30T01:55:02Z

@alisenchung Pushed as commit c671089.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

alisenchung · 2025-07-30T01:55:23Z

/backport jdk jdk25

openjdk · 2025-07-30T01:56:32Z

@alisenchung the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-alisenchung-c671089d-jdk25 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk:jdk25, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit c671089d from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Alisen Chung on 30 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by Justin Lu, Naoto Sato, Damon Nguyen and Alexey Semenyuk.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-alisenchung-c671089d-jdk25:backport-alisenchung-c671089d-jdk25
$ git checkout backport-alisenchung-c671089d-jdk25
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk.git backport-alisenchung-c671089d-jdk25

⚠️ @alisenchung You are not yet a collaborator in my fork openjdk-bots/jdk. An invite will be sent out and you need to accept it before you can proceed.

update l10n

f1daee3

openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 25, 2025

openjdk bot added javadoc [email protected] core-libs [email protected] compiler [email protected] labels Jul 25, 2025

justin-curtis-lu approved these changes Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

justin-curtis-lu reviewed Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

naotoj approved these changes Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 25, 2025

DamonGuy approved these changes Jul 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

alexeysemenyukoracle approved these changes Jul 28, 2025

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 30, 2025

openjdk bot closed this Jul 30, 2025

openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 30, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467

8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467

alisenchung commented Jul 25, 2025 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

Uh oh!

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

mlbridge bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu left a comment •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

alexeysemenyukoracle Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

alexeysemenyukoracle commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

alisenchung commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

alisenchung commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467

8364089: JDK 25 RDP2 L10n resource files update #26467

Conversation

alisenchung commented Jul 25, 2025 • edited by openjdk bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Progress

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Uh oh!

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

mlbridge bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Webrevs

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

alexeysemenyukoracle Jul 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

justin-curtis-lu Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

alexeysemenyukoracle commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

alisenchung commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

alisenchung commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alisenchung commented Jul 25, 2025 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

justin-curtis-lu left a comment •

edited

Loading