Skip to content

8361702: C2: assert(is_dominator(compute_early_ctrl(limit, limit_ctrl), pre_end)) failed: node pinned on loop exit test? #26424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rwestrel
Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel commented Jul 22, 2025

A node in a pre loop only has uses out of the loop dominated by the
loop exit. PhaseIdealLoop::try_sink_out_of_loop() sets its control
to the loop exit projection. A range check in the main loop has this
node as input (through a chain of some other nodes). Range check
elimination needs to update the exit condition of the pre loop with an
expression that depends on the node pinned on its exit: that's
impossible and the assert fires. This is a variant of 8314024 (this
one was for a node with uses out of the pre loop on multiple paths). I
propose the same fix: leave the node with control in the pre loop in
this case.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8361702: C2: assert(is_dominator(compute_early_ctrl(limit, limit_ctrl), pre_end)) failed: node pinned on loop exit test? (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26424/head:pull/26424
$ git checkout pull/26424

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26424
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26424/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26424

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26424

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26424.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back roland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@rwestrel This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@rwestrel The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small comments, otherwise, looks good! I launched some testing.

Somehow forgot to submit my review from 2 days ago...

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants