Skip to content

8362889: [GCC static analyzer] leak in libstringPlatformChars.c #26415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Jul 21, 2025

This is reported by the gcc static analyzer (-fanalyzer); it is just test coding so not very critical but probably should still be adjusted .

/jdk/test/jdk/java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/libstringPlatformChars.c:74:12: warning: leak of 'str' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
   74 | return JNU_NewStringPlatform(env, str);

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362889: [GCC static analyzer] leak in libstringPlatformChars.c (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26415/head:pull/26415
$ git checkout pull/26415

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26415
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26415/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26415

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26415

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26415.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 21, 2025

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8362889: [GCC static analyzer] leak in libstringPlatformChars.c 8362889: [GCC static analyzer] leak in libstringPlatformChars.c Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ Java_StringPlatformChars_newString(JNIEnv *env, jclass unused, jbyteArray bytes)
str[len] = '\0';
(*env)->ReleasePrimitiveArrayCritical(env, bytes, (void*)jbytes, 0);

return JNU_NewStringPlatform(env, str);
jstring res = JNU_NewStringPlatform(env, str);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At line 66: where it returns null, it seem like it should also be freeing str. (The analyzer didn't catch that?)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It catches that too

/jdk/test/jdk/java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/libstringPlatformChars.c:65:8: warning: leak of 'str' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
   65 |     if (jbytes == NULL) {

and also

/jdk/test/jdk/java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/libstringPlatformChars.c:69:16: warning: dereference of possibly-NULL 'str' [CWE-690] [-Wanalyzer-possible-null-dereference]
   69 |         str[i] = (char)jbytes[i];
      |         ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just overlooked it because a log of a full build with '-fanalyzer' enabled contains quite a lot of output (the event explanations of every finding are rather long).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems better to defer the malloc until after you know jbytes is not null; and also check the malloc result for null.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants