-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8362838: RISC-V: Incorrect matching rule leading to improper oop instruction encoding #26318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8362838: RISC-V: Incorrect matching rule leading to improper oop instruction encoding #26318
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fjiang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@feilongjiang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 38 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@feilongjiang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
b87ac34
to
237f837
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Look good to me. Thanks for fixing this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Can you confirm the generated code in the case of non-legal addresses for byte_map_base?
@yadongw Thanks for the review!
Yes. I added some code to allocate the JNI handler around the byte_map_base (feilongjiang@4c9b39d). We can reproduce the crash on RISC-V, and the crash is gone after applying the fix. |
@RealFYang @yadongw -- Thanks! |
Going to push as commit 0ba2942.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@feilongjiang Pushed as commit 0ba2942. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Same as JDK-8361892, but for riscv.
Testing:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26318/head:pull/26318
$ git checkout pull/26318
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26318
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26318/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26318
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26318
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26318.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment