Skip to content

Conversation

liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented Jul 10, 2025

The class file format often only stores lists up to 65535 in size because size is encoded as a u2. Currently, we truncate the list size and write all contents, creating malformed class files. Almost all scenarios where such oversized lists are created can be considered an error; we should eagerly reject lists that would never be encodable in the class file format when users construct model objects.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8361906 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API (Bug - P4)
  • JDK-8361906: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26252/head:pull/26252
$ git checkout pull/26252

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26252
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26252/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26252

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26252

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26252.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/26201 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API

Reviewed-by: asotona

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs [email protected] csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Jul 10, 2025
@liach liach marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2025 21:26
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -171,7 +171,8 @@ default boolean has(AccessFlag flag) {
* @param uses the consumed services
* @param provides the provided services
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code moduleFlags} is not in the
* range {@code [0, 65535]}
* range {@code [0, 65535]}, or any of the collections have more than
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry, I take it back. It is OK.

Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job for mitigating accidental building of invalid class files!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2025

⚠️ @liach This pull request contains merges that bring in commits not present in the target repository. Since this is not a "merge style" pull request, these changes will be squashed when this pull request in integrated. If this is your intention, then please ignore this message. If you want to preserve the commit structure, you must change the title of this pull request to Merge <project>:<branch> where <project> is the name of another project in the OpenJDK organization (for example Merge jdk:master).

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 11, 2025

@liach This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Aug 11, 2025

/touch

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 11, 2025

@liach The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

@openjdk-notifier openjdk-notifier bot changed the base branch from pr/26201 to master August 29, 2025 14:41
@openjdk-notifier
Copy link

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout fix/cf-list-sizes
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 29, 2025

@liach this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout fix/cf-list-sizes
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Aug 29, 2025
@liach liach requested a review from asotona August 29, 2025 14:53
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Aug 29, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Aug 29, 2025

I have updated this patch to be against mainline. The bot has a bit of latency that it still has a bunch of warnings, but there is no merge conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Aug 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 3, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Sep 3, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Going to push as commit 431f467.
Since your change was applied there have been 66 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2025

@liach Pushed as commit 431f467.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants