Skip to content

[StepSecurity] Apply security best practices #6287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

step-security-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This pull request is created by StepSecurity at the request of @cijothomas. Please merge the Pull Request to incorporate the requested changes. Please tag @cijothomas on your message if you have any questions related to the PR.

Security Fixes

Keeping your actions up to date with Dependabot

With Dependabot version updates, when Dependabot identifies an outdated dependency, it raises a pull request to update the manifest to the latest version of the dependency. This is recommended by GitHub as well as The Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Feedback

For bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback; please email [email protected]. To create such PRs, please visit https://app.stepsecurity.io/securerepo.

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot [email protected]

@step-security-bot step-security-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 05:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added the infra Infra work - CI/CD, code coverage, linters label May 16, 2025
@@ -18,3 +18,338 @@ updates:
update-types:
- "version-update:semver-major"
- "version-update:semver-minor"

- package-ecosystem: nuget
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if this or manual one is better...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either manual or monthly could be a better cadence here. Daily would increase maintenance burden.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.55%. Comparing base (ee720ba) to head (13d7225).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6287      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.53%   86.55%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         258      258              
  Lines       11792    11792              
==========================================
+ Hits        10204    10207       +3     
+ Misses       1588     1585       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests-Project-Experimental 86.36% <ø> (+0.19%) ⬆️
unittests-Project-Stable 86.14% <ø> (-0.27%) ⬇️
unittests-Solution 86.24% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests-UnstableCoreLibraries-Experimental 85.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity and will be closed in 7 days. Commenting or pushing will instruct the bot to automatically remove the label. This bot runs once per day.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Issues and pull requests which have been flagged for closing due to inactivity label May 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
infra Infra work - CI/CD, code coverage, linters Stale Issues and pull requests which have been flagged for closing due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants