Skip to content

[IMP] account: Quick search on an amount in the journal items #4803

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

abmn-odoo
Copy link

@abmn-odoo abmn-odoo commented Jul 2, 2025

[IMP] account: Quick search on an amount in the journal items

An accountant should be able to search for journal items with a specific amount to make reconciliation easier.

Users are now able to search for journal items by a specific amount.

task-4908885

@abmn-odoo abmn-odoo requested a review from malb-odoo July 2, 2025 07:44
@abmn-odoo abmn-odoo self-assigned this Jul 2, 2025
@robodoo
Copy link

robodoo commented Jul 2, 2025

This PR targets the un-managed branch odoo-dev/odoo:18.0-rd-accounting-onboarding-malb, it needs to be retargeted before it can be merged.

Copy link

@malb-odoo malb-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Niceee missing task id and one change to make it better 😄

An accountant should be able to search for a journal item with a specific amount to make reconciliation easier.

User is able to search journal items with a specific amount.

task-4908885
@abmn-odoo abmn-odoo force-pushed the 18.0-rd-accounting-onboarding-search-journal-items-by-amount-abmn branch from 314eb6e to d06dc1c Compare July 2, 2025 18:38
Copy link

@malb-odoo malb-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly what i expected niceee

@malb-odoo malb-odoo closed this Jul 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants