Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MAINT]: Failing workflow due to support for GHES 3.16 #483

Closed
1 task done
GhadimiR opened this issue Feb 27, 2025 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task done

[MAINT]: Failing workflow due to support for GHES 3.16 #483

GhadimiR opened this issue Feb 27, 2025 · 5 comments
Labels
Type: Maintenance Any dependency, housekeeping, and clean up Issue or PR

Comments

@GhadimiR
Copy link

Describe the need

This workflow is failing due to GHES support for 3.16 not being added to this list. This is preventing non-GHES changes getting into the package.

SDK Version

No response

API Version

No response

Relevant log output

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@GhadimiR GhadimiR added Status: Triage This is being looked at and prioritized Type: Maintenance Any dependency, housekeeping, and clean up Issue or PR labels Feb 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

@nickfloyd nickfloyd moved this from 🆕 Triage to 📆 Monthly in 🧰 Octokit Active Feb 27, 2025
@wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

Fixed in #478

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📆 Monthly to ✅ Done in 🧰 Octokit Active Mar 11, 2025
@wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

The release workflow is failing because the token suddenly needs OTP...

Ping @gr2m @kfcampbell @nickfloyd

Would it be possible to fix the token so it doesn't require OTP anymore

@wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

The package will need to be manually published to npm

@nickfloyd
Copy link
Contributor

Would it be possible to fix the token so it doesn't require OTP anymore

Let me see if I can check org policies on that. I know there has been more tightening of security type things. I'll let you know. Thanks for providing cover.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Maintenance Any dependency, housekeeping, and clean up Issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants