Skip to content

Conversation

@owlstronaut
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@owlstronaut owlstronaut requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2025 20:48
@owlstronaut
Copy link
Contributor Author

owlstronaut commented Oct 16, 2025

@wraithgar I wasn't able to validate this bit until testing in the real CI. I didn't want to be specific about v24, but think we have to here. Also there is a specific time in v22 that --test-timeout was added, so we can't include that in the base testing either - but we get that with the v24. I think that is okay here until we run into it and have to solve it.

npm/abbrev-js#108 the real CI here is passing short of needing this template change

@wraithgar
Copy link
Member

--test-timeout was Added in: v21.2.0, v20.11.0.

@wraithgar
Copy link
Member

It may also be time to think about being more explicit with test timeouts. Tests that need the large timeout can have it set and we can be more aware of where those are needed?

@owlstronaut
Copy link
Contributor Author

--test-timeout was Added in: v21.2.0, v20.11.0.

I mean yes and no, the backporting doesn't line up perfectly with these older versions being tested in various cli repos. There is also this issue for v22 nodejs/node#57672 (comment).

@wraithgar

@owlstronaut owlstronaut merged commit eeb4266 into main Oct 20, 2025
17 checks passed
@owlstronaut owlstronaut deleted the owlstronaut/ci-fix branch October 20, 2025 15:02
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2025
owlstronaut pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[4.26.1](v4.26.0...v4.26.1)
(2025-10-20)
### Bug Fixes
*
[`eeb4266`](eeb4266)
[#531](#531) uses ci-friendly
startsWith instead of fromJSON (#531) (@owlstronaut)

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants