Search output colorizer #417
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bodigrim
reviewed
Nov 24, 2025
Collaborator
Bodigrim
left a comment
Bodigrim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@head-gardener could you please rebase?
Collaborator
|
It looks awesome: |
This was referenced Dec 7, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another crack at #133, using
ansi-terminal. You've mentioned on #363 that it would be preferable to adapt web-server's approach to highlights - which I did here.targetInfoandtargetResultDisplaypasstargetItemtohighlightItemwhencoloris on. OnhighlightItem- it needs to be refactored to support arbitrary outputs (HTML and ANSI currently) if this PR goes forward.WIP, opening PR to get some feedback.
Preview
