-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove some unneeded memory allocation #614
Open
TurkeyMcMac
wants to merge
7
commits into
minetest-mods:master
Choose a base branch
from
TurkeyMcMac:opt
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fee53f3
Speed up internal info getters a little bit
TurkeyMcMac 468ec52
Improve linking
TurkeyMcMac d4acc6a
Avoid most node copies
TurkeyMcMac 569677d
Fix use of link_inverted
TurkeyMcMac 49645b1
Rename const_node to rule_node_nocopy
TurkeyMcMac 55cc507
Improve non-VM swap_node_force
TurkeyMcMac e4f2f84
Implement legacy linking functions
TurkeyMcMac File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you happen to know where this would be documented?
Also: How much of a performance difference are we talking about here? A new variable and checks to skip a table creation with three indices seems to be overkill - at least to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure where this should be documented. I can't tell the source of the documentation at https://mesecons.net/developers.html.
I think avoiding copying is worth it, since the garbage collector is a known limitation to the speed of LuaJIT. If you have 10k insulated wire segments, that's 10k allocations saved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that code complexity (O) matters most. If the function calls are proportional to the amount of placed wires, such an optimization does not seem to be urgent due to "sane" linear scaling in computational. Of course it does make a small difference, but nothing compared to the case if it would scale by O(n²). Hence the time used by an allocation and later GC appears negligible.
Either way ... what would you think of renaming the variable to
rule_node_nocopy
?action_on
still receives a copy after all.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optimizations to the code complexity have the highest yield, but eventually the only optimizations left to do involve reducing the constant factor. I think these are still important since people use Mesecons to build vast contraptions such as whole computers. In these cases, even a 1% optimization reduces the absolute execution time by a lot.
I will rename the variable to
rule_node_nocopy
.