We turn our backs on confusion and seek the beginning. -- Sevrin
Note: Clojure 1.9 will introduce a new core library, known as clojure.spec, which makes Herbert obsolete.
A schema language for edn (Clojure data).
The extensible data notation (edn) defines a useful subset of Clojure data types. As described on edn-format.org:
edn is a system for the conveyance of values. It is not a type system, and has no schemas.
The explicit lack of schemas in edn stands in marked contrast to many serialization libraries which use an interface definition language. The edn values essentially speak for themselves, without the need for a separate description or layer of interpretation. That is not to say that schemas aren't potentially useful, they're just not part of the definition of the edn format.
The goal of the Herbert project is to provide a convenient schema language for defining edn data structures that can be used for documentation and validation. The schema patterns are represented as edn values.
Herbert is available from Clojars. Add the following dependency to your project.clj:
The main namespace is miner.herbert. The conforms? predicate takes a schema pattern and
a value to test. It returns true if the value conforms to the schema pattern, false
otherwise.
The conform function is used to build a test function. Given a schema, it returns a function of
one argument that will execute a match against the schema pattern and return a map of bindings if
successful or nil for a failed match. If you need to know how the schema bindings matched a value
or you want to test against a schema multiple times, you should use conform to define a test
function.
Quick example:
(require '[miner.herbert :as h])
(h/conforms? '{:a int :b [sym+] :c str} '{:a 42 :b [foo bar baz] :c "foo"})
;=> true
;; For better performance, create a test function with `h/conform`.
(def my-test (h/conform '{:a (:= A int) :b [sym+] :c str}))
(my-test '{:a 42 :b [foo bar baz] :c "foo"})
;=> {A 42}
The property function takes a predicate and a schema as arguments and returns a
test.check property suitable for generative testing. (test.check also has a defspec
macro for use with clojure.test.) If you just want the generator for a schema, call
generator. The sample function is similar to test.check version but takes a schema.
(require '[miner.herbert.generators :as hg])
(require '[clojure.test.check :as tc])
;; trivial example
(tc/quick-check 100 (hg/property integer? 'int))
;; confirm the types of the values
(tc/quick-check 100 (hg/property (fn [m] (and (integer? (:int m)) (string? (:str m))))
'{:int int :str str :kw kw}))
;; only care about the 42 in the right place
(tc/quick-check 100 (hg/property (fn [m] (== (get-in m [:v 2 :int]) 42))
'{:v (vec kw kw {:int 42} kw) :str str}))
;; samples from a schema generator
(clojure.test.check.generators/sample (hg/generator '[int*]))
;=> (() (9223372036854775807) [9223372036854775807] () [] (1 1) () [-7] (4) [-5])
;; generate samples directly from a schema (notice the "hg" namespace)
(hg/sample '[int*])
;=> (() [-1 0] () (9223372036854775807) [9223372036854775807] [] () () [0 -5] [9223372036854775807] (7 9223372036854775807) [] (12 -11) (-9223372036854775808) [-12 9223372036854775807] [-10 9223372036854775807] (-11) [2] (-11) [-7])
-
Literal constants match themselves:
nil, true, false, numbers, "strings", :keywords -
Empty literal collections match themselves:
[], (), {} -
A simple schema pattern is named by a symbol:
- int - integer
- float - floating-point
- str - string
- kw - keyword
- sym - symbol
- vec - vector
- list - list or cons (actually anything that satisfies
clojure.core/seq?) - seq - any sequential (including vectors)
- map - map
- char - character
- bool - boolean
- any - anything
-
A few additional schema patterns for numeric sub-types:
- num - any number
- pos - positive number
- neg - negative number
- zero - zero number
- even - even integer
- odd - odd integer
-
A quantified schema pattern: adding a *, + or ? at the end of a symbol for zero-or-more, one-or-more, or zero-or-one (optional):
int*, str+, sym? -
A quoted expression matches itself without any other interpretation:
'foo? matches the symbol foo? literally. -
A compound schema pattern: using and, or and not
(or sym+ nil)-- one or more symbols or nil
(or (vec int*) (list kw+))-- either a vector of ints or a list of one or more keywords -
A quantified schema pattern: a list beginning with *, + or ? as the first element.
(* kw sym)-- zero or more cycles of keywords and symbols -
A named schema expression is written as a list with the first element being the
:=operator, followed by a (non-reserved) symbol as the binding name, and the rest of the list being a schema pattern. The names of predicates and special operators (like and, or, etc.) are not allowed as binding names. The name may be used as a parameter to other schema patterns. Also, the name may be used in the pattern expression to create a recursive pattern.
(:= N int 1 10)-- matches 1 to 10 (inclusive)
(:= A (or :a [:b A]))-- matches [:b [:b [:b :a]]] -
A bound symbol matches an element equal to the value that the name was bound to previously.
[(:= N int) N N]-- matches [3 3 3] -
A literal vector [in square brackets] matches any sequential (not just a vector) with the contained pattern.
[(* kw sym)]-- matches (:a foo :b bar :c baz) and [:a foo] -
A literal map in {curly braces} matches any map with the given literal keys and values matching the corresponding schemas. Optional keywords are written with a ? suffix such as :kw?. (Use a quote mark to match a literal keyword ending with ?. ':k? matches :k? literally without any special interpretation of the ? suffix.) For convenience, an optional keyword schema implicitly allows nil for the corresponding value. An empty literal map {} matches exactly the empty map. Use
mapto match any map.
{:a int :b sym :c? [int*]}-- matches {:a 10 :b foo :c [1 2 3]} and {:a 1 :b bar}
{:x? sym ':k? int}-- matches {:k? 10} but not {:k 10} because the keyword was quoted. -
The literal map in {curly braces} may also contains a single pair of patterns with a non-literal key pattern. All keys and and values are required to match in the map value. This kind of pattern is useful for matching "functional" maps.
{kw int}-- matches {:a 10 :b 20}, but not {:a 1 :b "bar"} -
A literal #{set} with multiple schema patterns denotes the required elements, but does not exclude others. A single element might match multiple patterns. A set with a quantified schema pattern defines the requirement on all elements.
#{int :a :b}-- matches #{:a :b :c 10}, but not #{:a 10}
#{int+}-- matches #{1 3 5}, but not #{1 :a 3} -
Numeric schema patterns, such as int, even, odd, float, or num, may take optional parameters in a list following the pattern name. Numerics take a low and a high parameter. The value must be between to the low and high (inclusive) for it to match. If only one parameter is given, it defines the high, and the low defaults to 0 in that case. If neither is given, there is no restriction on the high or low values. Quantified numeric patterns apply the high and low to all the matched elements.
(int 1 10)-- matches 4, but not 12 -
String, symbol and keyword schema patterns (such as str, sym and kw) may take an optional regex argument, specified as a string (for edn compatibility) or a Clojure regular expression (like
#"[Rr]ege?x"). In that case, thepr-strof the element must match the regex.
(kw ":user/.*")-- matches :user/foo -
An inlined schema pattern: a list starting with
&as the first element refers to multiple elements in order (as opposed to being within a collection). It can be useful for addingwhentests where an extra element would not normally be allowed.
{:a (:= N int) :b (& (:= F float) (> N F))}-- matches {:a 4 :b 3.14} -
The
mapschema predicate matches a map. It takes the same arguments as the {curly brace} literal map schema. With no arguments,(map)matches any map, same asmap. Use{}to match the empty map.
(map :a int :b sym :c? [int*])-- matches {:a 10 :b foo :c [1 2 3]} and {:a 1 :b bar} -
The
listschema predicate matches a list or cons. It can take multiple optional arguments to specify the schemas for the ordered elements of the list.
(list sym (* kw int))-- matches (foo :a 42 :b 52 :c 22) -
The
vecschema predicate matches a vector. It can take multiple optional arguments to specify the schemas for the ordered elements of the vector.
(vec int (* sym int))-- matches [4 foo 42 bar 52] -
The
seqschema predicate matches any sequential (vector or list). It's basically the same as using the [square bracket] notation.
(seq kw int sym)-- matches (:a 10 foo) and [:b 11 bar] -
The
setschema predicate matches a set. It's basically the same as the #{set} literal notation.
(set :a :b)-- matches #{:a :b :c 10}, but not #{:a 10}
(set int+)-- matches #{1 3 5}, but not #{1 :a 3} -
A list starting with
classfollowed by a dotted symbol matches an instance of that Java class. In general, you should avoid bringing classes directly into your schema pattern. It's more flexible and extensible to usetag.
(class java.util.Date)-- matches a java.util.Date, but not a java.util.Calendar -
The
taglist pattern takes a symbol as its first argument. The pattern matches against theedn-tagof the item. The first argument may also be a string which is interpreted as a regex matching thepr-strof theedn-tag. The optional second argument may be a literal (such as a "string") in which case the value is whatever constantedn/read-stringwould construct by reading a string with that tag and literal. On the other hand, if the option second argument is a non-literal schema pattern that pattern will be matched against theedn-valueof the item. For example, the Herbertmapnotation would be appropriate for matching a record value. Theedn-tagandedn-valueare defined in the tagged project. See theminer.tagged.EdnTagprotocol for more information. Basically, theedn-tagis the symbol that normally would be used to print as a tagged record (record classmy.ns.Recwould use tagmy.ns/Rec). Several Java classes corresponding to built-in tagged literals (seeclojure.core/default-data-readers) have predefined tags as well. Theedn-valueis typically a map for a record or the item itself for most other classes. Custom records and Java classes can extend theminer.tagged.EdnTagprotocol to participate intagpattern matching.
(tag my.ns/Rec {:a int})-- matches an instance of the record classmy.ns.Recwith an integer value for the key:a.
(tag inst)-- matches any instance of java.util.Date, java.util.Calendar or java.sql.Timestamp
-
The
predlist pattern takes as the first argument the name of a Clojure function that should be called to test the input. The function name should be a fully qualified symbol naming the var holding the predicate function. If the predicate is parameterized, the implementing function should take those parameters first. In all cases, the last argument should be the item in question. Note that the predicate should accept all values for consideration without throwing an exception. For example, theevenschema predicate is implemented with a test ofclojure.core/integer?as well asclojure.core/even?because the latter will throw on non-integer values. The default predicates are defined in the varminer.herbert/default-predicates.
(pred clojure.string/blank?)-- matches nil or "" or " " -
The
grammarpattern defines a grammar for more complex schema patterns. The first argument is the start-pattern which is the actual pattern to match. It is followed by zero or more rules, declared as an inline pair of a symbol, theterm, and its pattern definition. A rule can refer to previously defined terms or use its own term symbol in a recursive pattern. The start-pattern can refer to any of the terms in thegrammarform. If you want to go crazy, you can nest anothergrammarpattern as the definition of a term, but the nestedgrammarexpression is in an isolated scope so its rules are not available to the outer scope.
(grammar [person+] phone (str "\\d{3}+-\\d{3}+-\\d{4}+") person {:name str :phone phone})-- matches [{:name "Herbert" :phone "408-555-1212"} {:name "Jenny" :phone "415-867-5309"}]
For conformance testing (as with conforms?), Herbert allows several terms to be
parameterized by regular expression (see str, sym, etc). Both the Clojure syntax
for regular expressions and the Java String format are allowed (see
clojure.core/re-pattern and java.util.regex.Pattern.) Note that Clojure regular
expressions (like #"foo+bar*") are not edn types, so you should use Strings if you want your
Herbert schemas to be completely edn-compatible. The main difference is that Java String
notation requires you to use double backslashes to get the effect of a single backslash in
your regex. For example, Clojure #"foo\d" would be written as the String "foo\\d".
Although the full Java regular expression syntax is supported for conformance testing, the
Herbert generator implementation supports only a limited form of regular expressions.
(Someday, test.check may support a regex generator, but for now, Herbert has to implement
string generation as best it can.) The built-in string generator supports basic regular
expressions with ASCII characters, such as "[a-z] [^abc] a.b* c+d(ef|gh)? \d\D\w\W\s\S". It
does not support advanced regex features such as unicode notation, minimum and maximum match
counts, intersection character classes, POSIX character classes, case-insensitity flags,
look-ahead, look-back, back-references, greedy, reluctant or possessive quantification, etc.
The dynamic Var *string-from-regex-generator* allows the user to customize the
test.check string generator used internally by Herbert. When
*string-from-regex-generator* is bound to a test.check generator, Herbert will use
this generator for any term that is parameterized by a regular expression. The generator
should take one argument, which can be either a java.util.regex.Pattern or a String,
as the regex. It should generate strings that match the given regex. When it's bound to nil
(the default), Herbert will use its internal string generator as described above.
If you need better support for Java regular expressions when generating Strings, you should
consider using the test.chuck library which provides the string-from-regex
generator. You can use it with Herbert like this:
(require '[com.gfredericks.test.chuck.generators :as chuck])
(require '[miner.herbert :as h])
(require '[miner.herbert.generators :as hg])
(binding [h/*string-from-regex-generator* chuck/string-from-regex]
(hg/sample '(str #"\x66oo\dbar{1,3}") 5))
;=> ("foo5bar" "foo2barr" "foo5barrr" "foo2barrr" "foo9bar")These features are implemented as an experiment, but I'm not sure I'll keep them as they're a bit of a hack:
-
The
whenform does not consume any input. The expression is evaluated within the enviroment of the previous bindings -- if it returns a logical true, the match continues. On a logical false, the whole match fails.
[(:= N int) (:= M int) (when (== (* 3 N) M))]-- matches [2 6] -
A list starting with
=,==,not=,<,>,<=or>=is an implied when and treated as if the form was within anwhentest.
[(:= N int) (:= M int) (== (* 3 N) M)]-- matches [2 6]
(require '[miner.herbert :as h])
(h/conforms? 'int 10)
;=> true
(h/conforms? '(grammar int) 10)
; a very simple "grammar" with no rules, equivalent to the start pattern
;=> true
(h/conforms? '(grammar {show numbers}, show str, numbers [int+]) '{"Lost" [4 8 15 16 23 42]})
; target pattern can use named subpatterns defined by tail of name/pattern pairs
;=> true
(h/conforms? '(:= A (or :a [:b A])) [:b [:b [:b :a]]])
; matches a recursive binding of `A`
;=> true
(h/conforms? '{:a int :b sym :c? [str*]} '{:a 1 :b foo :c ["foo" "bar" "baz"]})
;=> true
(h/conforms? '{:a int :b sym :c? [str*]} '{:a 1 :b foo})
; :c is optional so it's OK if it's not there at all.
;=> true
(h/conforms? '{:a int :b sym :c? [str*]} '{:a foo :b bar})
;=> false
(h/conforms? '{:a (:= A int) :b sym :c? [A+]} '{:a 1 :b foo :c [1 1 1]})
; `A` is bound to the int associated with :a, and then used again to define the values
; in the seq associated with :c.
;=> true
(h/conforms? '(& {:a (:= A int) :b (:= B sym) :c (:= C [B+])} (when (= (count C) A)))
'{:a 2 :b foo :c [foo foo]})
; The & operator just means the following elements are found inline,
; not in a collection. In this case, we use it to associate the
; when-test with the single map constraint. The assertion says that
; number of elements in the :c value must be equal to the value
; associated with :a. Notice that all the elements in the :c seq
; must be equal to the symbol associated with :b.
=> true
((h/conform '[(:= A int) (:= B int) (:= C int+ A B)]) [3 7 4 5 6])
; Inside a seq, the first two ints establish the low and high range of the rest
; of the int values.
;=> {C [4 5 6], B 7, A 3}
(def my-checker (h/conform '[(:= MAX int) (:= XS int+ MAX)]))
(my-checker [7 3 5 6 4])
;=> {XS [3 5 6 4], MAX 7}
(defn palindrome? [s]
(and (string? s)
(= s (clojure.string/reverse s))))
(h/conforms? '(grammar [pal+]
palindrome user/palindrome?
pal {:len (:= LEN int) :palindrome (and palindrome (cnt LEN))})
[{:palindrome "civic" :len 5}
{:palindrome "kayak" :len 5}
{:palindrome "level" :len 5}
{:palindrome "ere" :len 3}
{:palindrome "racecar" :len 7}])
;=> trueIf you want to mix external data into a Herbert pattern, I suggest that you use the
backtick library's template function.
- edn: http://edn-format.org
- Clojure: http://clojure.org
- Square Peg parser: https://github.com/ericnormand/squarepeg
- tagged: https://github.com/miner/tagged
- test.check: https://github.com/clojure/test.check
- "The Way to Eden" lightning talk at Clojure/Conj 2013
- "Generating Generators" talk at Clojure/Conj 2014
If Herbert isn't exactly what you're looking for, here are some other projects that take different approaches to similar problems:
- clj-schema: https://github.com/runa-dev/clj-schema
- Prismatic Schema: https://github.com/prismatic/schema
- Strucjure: https://github.com/jamii/strucjure
- Sequence Expressions (seqex): https://github.com/jclaggett/seqex
- Regexp for Sequences (seqexp): https://github.com/cgrand/seqexp
- Truss: https://github.com/ptaoussanis/truss
- Structural Typing: https://github.com/marick/structural-typing/
- Annotate: https://github.com/roomkey/annotate
stardate 5832.3
Space Hippies: "Herbert, Herbert, Herbert ..."
Spock: "Herbert was a minor official notorious for his rigid and limited patterns of thought."
Kirk: "Well, I shall try to be less rigid in my thinking."
video clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQONBf9xMss
Copyright (c) 2013 Stephen E. Miner.
Distributed under the Eclipse Public License, the same as Clojure.

