Skip to content

Update license field to use proper SPDX identifier #1310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2025

Conversation

leifdreizler
Copy link

This changes the license field to be a valid SPDX identifier aligning with PEP 639. This populates the license_expression field in the PyPI API and is used by downstream tools including deps.dev

These changes were generated by Claude after reviewing the license and manifest files in your repository, but opened and reviewed by me. Please let me know if the analysis is incorrect and thanks for being an OSS maintainer.

@leifdreizler leifdreizler requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2025 21:44
Copy link
Member

@baywet baywet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution.
Would you mind doing the same for beta and core as well please?

This changes the license field to be a valid [SPDX identifier](https://spdx.org/licenses) aligning with [PEP 639](https://peps.python.org/pep-0639/#project-source-metadata). This populates the `license_expression` field in the PyPI API and is used by downstream tools including deps.dev

These changes were generated by Claude after reviewing the license and manifest files in your repository, but opened and reviewed by me. Please let me know if the analysis is incorrect and thanks for being an OSS maintainer.
@leifdreizler
Copy link
Author

leifdreizler commented Aug 4, 2025

@baywet baywet merged commit aab1c9e into microsoftgraph:main Aug 5, 2025
12 checks passed
@leifdreizler leifdreizler deleted the fix-spdx-license branch August 5, 2025 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants