[JS] fix: fix type of image message #1124
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kuojianlu
requested review from
corinagum,
aacebo,
lilyydu and
singhk97
as code owners
kuojianlu
changed the title
corinagum
requested changes
Jan 4, 2024
corinagum
reviewed
Jan 4, 2024
corinagum
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Linked issues
closes: #1113
Details
Provide a list of your changes here. If you are fixing a bug, please provide steps to reproduce the bug.
Change details
code snippets:
screenshots:
Attestation Checklist
My code follows the style guidelines of this project
I have checked for/fixed spelling, linting, and other errors
I have commented my code for clarity
I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (we use TypeDoc to document our code)
My changes generate no new warnings
I have added tests that validates my changes, and provides sufficient test coverage. I have tested with:
New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Additional information