Skip to content

🤖 User test baselines have changed #27071

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Please review the diff and merge if no changes are unexpected.
You can view the build log here.

cc @weswigham @sandersn @RyanCavanaugh

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3464,62): error TS2554: Expected 0 argume
node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3690,23): error TS2554: Expected 0 arguments, but got 1.
node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3711,24): error TS2339: Property 'parent' does not exist on type 'TreeTransformer'.
node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3721,28): error TS2339: Property 'parent' does not exist on type 'TreeTransformer'.
node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3880,21): error TS2403: Subsequent variable declarations must have the same type. Variable 'defs' must be of type 'Dictionary & { set: (key: any, val: any) => any; add: (key: any, val: any) => any; get: (key: any) => any; del: (key: any) => any; has: (key: any) => boolean; each: (f: any) => void; size: () => any; map: (f: any) => any[]; clone: () => Dictionary & any; toObject: () => any; }', but here has type 'any'.
node_modules/uglify-js/lib/compress.js(3880,21): error TS2403: Subsequent variable declarations must have the same type. Variable 'defs' must be of type 'Dictionary & { set: (key: any, val: any) => Dictionary & any; add: (key: any, val: any) => Dictionary & any; get: (key: any) => any; del: (key: any) => Dictionary & any; has: (key: any) => boolean; ... 4 more ...; toObject: () => any; }', but here has type 'any'.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we aren't eliminating any any more? I thought that intersection construction was pretty strict about that though.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, this has to do with the printing of infinite (mapped?) types. They are printed as any but not treated as any, it looks like. @weswigham does this sound correct?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be what they do, I believe. Not sure if that comes in to play here, though. Being a js file, I wonder how an infinite mapped type would come to be.

@@ -1289,8 +1289,19 @@ node_modules/chrome-devtools-frontend/front_end/audits2_worker/lighthouse/lighth
node_modules/chrome-devtools-frontend/front_end/audits2_worker/lighthouse/lighthouse-background.js(44348,15): error TS2339: Property 'keysArray' does not exist on type 'Map<any, any>'.
node_modules/chrome-devtools-frontend/front_end/audits2_worker/lighthouse/lighthouse-background.js(44356,15): error TS2339: Property 'inverse' does not exist on type 'Map<any, any>'.
node_modules/chrome-devtools-frontend/front_end/audits2_worker/lighthouse/lighthouse-background.js(44361,8): error TS2339: Property 'set' does not exist on type 'Multimap'.
node_modules/chrome-devtools-frontend/front_end/audits2_worker/lighthouse/lighthouse-background.js(44439,17): error TS2339: Property 'get' does not exist on type 'Multimap'.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably a result of #26925, though I need to figure out why.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only works at top-level, and codemirror is wrapped in a namespacey set of functions. Filed #27095 to track.

@sandersn
Copy link
Member

Closing in favour of the newer PR.

@sandersn sandersn closed this Sep 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants