Skip to content

Conversation

zwang123
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@icecream17 icecream17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nothing blocking

(It says 166 commits, but it's more like a dozen. Nevertheless, commit by commit reviewing seems less trivial than reviewing the entire Files changed)

set.mm Outdated
FUAUBUCVGFJFVFFUDUEUFTUGUHUJUIUKULT $.

$( Alternate definition of ` tpos ` . The second half of the right hand
side could be applied ~ ressn and become ` ( F |`` { (/) } ) `
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
side could be applied ~ ressn and become ` ( F |`` { (/) } ) `
side could apply ~ ressn and become ` ( F |`` { (/) } ) `

Copy link
Contributor Author

@zwang123 zwang123 Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 837996 to 838000
$( The transposition restricted to a converse is the transposition of the
restricted class, with the empty set removed from the domain.
(Contributed by Zhi Wang, 6-Oct-2025.) $)
tposrescnv $p |- ( tpos F |` `' R )
= ( F o. ( x e. `' dom ( F |` R ) |-> U. `' { x } ) ) $=
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(note: the RHS is a more useful form of ( tpos ( F |` R ) ) |` ( _V \ { (/) } ) by df-tpos)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 840898 to 840915
${
elxpcbasex1.t $e |- T = ( C Xc. D ) $.
elxpcbasex1.b $e |- B = ( Base ` T ) $.
elxpcbasex1.x $e |- ( ph -> X e. B ) $.
$( A non-empty base set of the product category indicates the existence of
the first factor of the product category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang,
8-Oct-2025.) $)
elxpcbasex1 $p |- ( ph -> C e. _V ) $=
( c1st cfv cbs cxp wcel eqid xpcbas eqtr4i eleqtrdi xp1st syl elfvexd ) A
FJKZLCAFCLKZDLKZMZNUBUCNAFBUEIBELKUEHCDEUCUDGUCOUDOPQRFUCUDSTUA $.

$( A non-empty base set of the product category indicates the existence of
the second factor of the product category. (Contributed by Zhi Wang,
8-Oct-2025.) $)
elxpcbasex2 $p |- ( ph -> D e. _V ) $=
( c2nd cfv cbs cxp wcel eqid xpcbas eqtr4i eleqtrdi xp2nd syl elfvexd ) A
FJKZLDAFCLKZDLKZMZNUBUDNAFBUEIBELKUEHCDEUCUDGUCOUDOPQRFUCUDSTUA $.
$}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if reldmxpc was proven a la reldmress, then these might be shortenable by elbasov and strov2rcl

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 841685 to 841687
$( The transposed curry functor of a functor ` F : D X. C --> E ` is a
functor tposcurry ` ( F ) : C --> ( D --> E ) ` . (Contributed by Zhi
Wang, 9-Oct-2025.) $)
Copy link
Contributor

@icecream17 icecream17 Oct 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note: the intended reading of this is:

...is a functor tposcurry( F ) : C --> ( D --> E )

Copy link
Contributor Author

@zwang123 zwang123 Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. I would like to put tposcurry into the "`" statement but I have not defined it yet. (Maybe will never define it per least definition rule...)

set.mm Outdated
WAUSUNZAWFLVNURWGLVTWAUSUNZUTAKVKLVNHWHWIUTAVEVPVFVQIABCDEFJKMNRSVAABCDEF
JLMNRTVAUTVBVC $.

$( Alternate proof for ~ swapf2f1oa . (Contributed by Zhi Wang,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: "Alternate proof of" is more common than "Alternate proof for" (216 vs 11), however, this doesn't error, so I guess it may be fine?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

|| many of the latter of which are mine ||

I am keeping others as is but fixing mine. e4c20f4

Copy link
Contributor

@tirix tirix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@tirix tirix merged commit dc6376a into metamath:develop Oct 17, 2025
10 checks passed
@zwang123 zwang123 deleted the swapf branch October 18, 2025 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants