Skip to content

Replace http.Server by a generic ListenAndServer #200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

inercia
Copy link

@inercia inercia commented Apr 23, 2025

Replace http.Server by a generic ListenAndServer, so we do not enforce a specific implementation of the server.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved flexibility of server integration, allowing compatibility with a wider range of server implementations. No changes to user-facing behavior.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This change introduces a new interface, Server, which defines the methods ListenAndServe() error and Shutdown(ctx context.Context) error. The SSEServer struct is updated so that its srv field now uses this interface instead of being restricted to a concrete *http.Server type. Additionally, the WithHTTPServer function is modified to accept any implementation of the Server interface. The NewSSEServer constructor initializes srv as nil, deferring HTTP server creation until Start is called. No other logic or control flow in the codebase is altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
server/sse.go Added the Server interface; changed SSEServer.srv field and WithHTTPServer function to use this interface instead of *http.Server; deferred HTTP server instantiation until Start.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 519b6b3 and fc34a1c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/sse.go (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • server/sse.go

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
server/sse.go (1)

54-58: Consider a more idiomatic interface name.

The interface name ListenAndServer seems to be derived from the method name ListenAndServe plus "Server", which is unusual in Go. Typically, interfaces are named after behaviors or roles, not method names. Consider renaming to something like HTTPServer or simply Server to better represent its role.

Also, the comment could be more precise - an interface doesn't implement methods, it defines them. Consider rewording to "defines a server that can listen for requests and be shut down."

-// ListenAndServer is a type that implements ListenAndServe and Shutdown
-type ListenAndServer interface {
+// Server defines a server that can listen for requests and be shut down
+type Server interface {
 	ListenAndServe() error
 	Shutdown(ctx context.Context) error
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 781b732 and 519b6b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/sse.go (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
server/sse.go (3)

70-70: Good abstraction through interface usage.

Changing the srv field from a concrete *http.Server type to the new interface type is a good application of dependency inversion. This enables greater flexibility by allowing any server implementation that satisfies the interface to be used.


140-140: Consistent interface usage.

Updating the WithHTTPServer function to accept the interface type is consistent with the field type change and completes the abstraction. This allows clients to provide any compatible server implementation, not just http.Server.


198-205:

✅ Verification successful

Verify compatibility with non-http.Server implementations.

The Start method creates a new *http.Server instance by default, which works with the new interface. However, there might be assumptions elsewhere in the code that srv is specifically an *http.Server. Let's verify there are no such assumptions.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any type assertions or specific http.Server method calls that might break with the interface

# Search for any type assertions to *http.Server
echo "Checking for type assertions to *http.Server:"
rg "\.\\(\*http\\.Server\\)" --type go

# Search for any method calls on srv that aren't part of the ListenAndServer interface
echo -e "\nChecking for method calls on srv that aren't in the interface:"
rg "srv\\.[^LS]" --type go | grep -v "ListenAndServe" | grep -v "Shutdown"

Length of output: 1495


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any direct s.srv.* method invocations across Go files
echo "Searching for s.srv.* method calls across the repository:"
rg "s\\.srv\\.[A-Za-z]\\w*" --type go -n

# Show the Start method in server/sse.go for context
echo -e "\n--- Start method in server/sse.go ---"
rg -n 'func (s \*Server) Start' -A5 -B5 server/sse.go

# Show the Stop (or Shutdown) method in server/sse.go for context
echo -e "\n--- Stop method in server/sse.go ---"
rg -n 'func (s \*Server) Stop' -A5 -B5 server/sse.go

Length of output: 504


No http.Server‐specific usage detected

  • No type assertions to *http.Server were found in the codebase.
  • The only call on s.srv is ListenAndServe(), which aligns with the ListenAndServer interface.

No further changes are needed.

@inercia inercia force-pushed the saurin/generic-server branch from 519b6b3 to 784ee20 Compare April 23, 2025 13:04
@inercia inercia force-pushed the saurin/generic-server branch from 784ee20 to fc34a1c Compare April 23, 2025 13:05
@penfree
Copy link

penfree commented Apr 24, 2025

I think the SSEServer should have the two method handleMessage/handleSSE changed to public, so that they can easily be plugged into other frameworks like gin, so that we can use many existing middlewares and other Tracing/Logging/Metric tools。

So,the messes about using a native http.Server could be seperated from sse.go, maybe the current SSEServer should be SSEHandlers with another new SSEServer only do the work of http serving. Then users can implement their own GinSSEServer or something else.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants