Skip to content

WebKit checkers: recgonize @YES / @NO as safe constants #148721

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2025

Conversation

rniwa
Copy link
Contributor

@rniwa rniwa commented Jul 14, 2025

No description provided.

@rniwa rniwa requested a review from t-rasmud July 14, 2025 20:59
@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:static analyzer labels Jul 14, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 14, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148721.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp (+4-1)
  • (modified) clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm (+4)
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
index cfcc47c5e71c8..478bd85177143 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
@@ -177,7 +177,10 @@ bool tryToFindPtrOrigin(
       E = unaryOp->getSubExpr();
       continue;
     }
-
+    if (auto *BoxedExpr = dyn_cast<ObjCBoxedExpr>(E)) {
+      E = BoxedExpr->getSubExpr();
+      continue;
+    }
     break;
   }
   // Some other expression.
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm b/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
index c33d53b047c2e..c69113c48806d 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
@@ -329,13 +329,17 @@ void foo() {
   }
 }
 
+#define YES 1
+
 namespace call_with_cf_constant {
   void bar(const NSArray *);
   void baz(const NSDictionary *);
+  void boo(NSNumber *);
   void foo() {
     CFArrayCreateMutable(kCFAllocatorDefault, 10);
     bar(@[@"hello"]);
     baz(@{@"hello": @3});
+    boo(@YES);
   }
 }
 

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 14, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1

Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148721.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp (+4-1)
  • (modified) clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm (+4)
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
index cfcc47c5e71c8..478bd85177143 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/ASTUtils.cpp
@@ -177,7 +177,10 @@ bool tryToFindPtrOrigin(
       E = unaryOp->getSubExpr();
       continue;
     }
-
+    if (auto *BoxedExpr = dyn_cast<ObjCBoxedExpr>(E)) {
+      E = BoxedExpr->getSubExpr();
+      continue;
+    }
     break;
   }
   // Some other expression.
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm b/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
index c33d53b047c2e..c69113c48806d 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/unretained-call-args.mm
@@ -329,13 +329,17 @@ void foo() {
   }
 }
 
+#define YES 1
+
 namespace call_with_cf_constant {
   void bar(const NSArray *);
   void baz(const NSDictionary *);
+  void boo(NSNumber *);
   void foo() {
     CFArrayCreateMutable(kCFAllocatorDefault, 10);
     bar(@[@"hello"]);
     baz(@{@"hello": @3});
+    boo(@YES);
   }
 }
 

@@ -329,13 +329,17 @@ void foo() {
}
}

#define YES 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it just @YES/@no that are safe constants? What's the expected behavior for say #define RANDOM 3 and boo(@ RANDOM);?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those are also considered safe. Basically @ any number should be treated as safe.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, got it. Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor

@t-rasmud t-rasmud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@rniwa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rniwa commented Jul 15, 2025

Thanks for the review!

@rniwa rniwa merged commit ae3bba4 into llvm:main Jul 15, 2025
12 checks passed
@rniwa rniwa deleted the recognize-boxed-int branch July 15, 2025 22:12
rniwa added a commit to rniwa/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2025
@steakhal
Copy link
Contributor

FYI I think it's good practice to not tag people in commit title/summaries unless it's strictly desired.
See the relevant discussion about this proposed policy change on Discuss.

@rniwa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rniwa commented Jul 16, 2025

oh, I didn't even realize @YES and @NO would tag people.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:static analyzer clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants