[clang-tools-extra][NFC] Fix link to code review in README.txt

[vbvictor]

I'm not sure if we need to add label inside link or not, but lists.llvm.org seems outdated for sure, WDYT?

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra

Author: Baranov Victor (vbvictor)

Changes

I'm not sure if we need to add label inside link or not, but lists.llvm.org seems outdated for sure, WDYT?

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148384.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) clang-tools-extra/README.txt (+2-3)

diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/README.txt b/clang-tools-extra/README.txt
index 6891e4078997f..7a0614facd835 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/README.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/README.txt
@@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ All discussion regarding Clang, Clang-based tools, and code in this repository
 should be held using the standard Clang forum:
   https://discourse.llvm.org/c/clang
 
-Code review for this tree should take place on the standard Clang patch and
-commit lists:
-  http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
+Code review for this tree should take place on Github:
+  https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pulls?q=label%3Aclang-tools-extra
 
 If you find a bug in these tools, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker:
   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/

[EugeneZelenko]

There are dedicated Discourse topics for Clangd and Clang-Tidy. May be they should be mentioned explicitly?

[vbvictor]

There are dedicated Discourse topics for Clangd and Clang-Tidy. May be they should be mentioned explicitly?

Added links to them as a list, do you think we need a new entry for each of the link?
IMO from reading the link name, user can understand where it points.

[EugeneZelenko]

There are dedicated Discourse topics for Clangd and Clang-Tidy. May be they should be mentioned explicitly?

Added links to them as a list, do you think we need a new entry for each of the link? IMO from reading the link name, user can understand where it points.

Yes, links are in comprehensible format.

[EugeneZelenko]

Looks OK for me, but please wait for other reviewers, I may miss something :-)