Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[duckdb] Created a CLI tool to interact with DuckDBDaVinciRecordTransformer #1473

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kvargha
Copy link
Contributor

@kvargha kvargha commented Jan 24, 2025

[duckdb] Created a CLI tool to interact with DuckDBDaVinciRecordTransformer

This PR creates a CLI tool to interact with DuckDBDaVinciRecordTransformer, similar to the AdminTool.

How was this PR tested?

I tested this locally pointed to a store that exists, but for the purpose of releasing this to OSS I generalized the variables.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Make sure to explain your proposed changes and call out the behavior change.

Copy link
Contributor

@FelixGV FelixGV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Koorous! Left some comments to try and make this more widely usable...

@kvargha kvargha changed the title [duckdb] Add example implementation of DuckDBDaVinciRecordTransformer [duckdb] Created a CLI tool to interact with DuckDBDaVinciRecordTransformer Jan 25, 2025

Options parameterOptionsForHelp = new Options();
for (Object obj: options.getOptions()) {
Option o = (Option) obj;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we use instanceOf to check whether the obj is an Option or we are pretty sure they are?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants