-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6512
Conversation
|
To conserve resource, the PR Tester does not automatically run for the blacklisted sender 'liferay-continuous-integration'. |
Summary of ChangesHello @liferay-continuous-integration, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request provides a minor but significant clarification to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates a comment in the test.properties file, changing the instruction from "DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE" to "DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE". While not deleting the file is important, the original instruction to not edit it was clearer and more aligned with the subsequent instructions, which detail how to override properties using a separate file. The new wording could cause confusion by implying that editing the file is now acceptable. I've added a comment suggesting a reversion to the original, more precise instruction to maintain clarity for developers.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| ## | |||
| ## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. | |||
| ## DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change from "DO NOT EDIT" to "DO NOT DELETE" makes the instruction less clear. The lines that follow describe a mechanism for overriding properties in a separate file, which implies this file should not be modified directly. The original instruction "DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE." correctly reflects this best practice, preventing developers from making local changes that might be accidentally committed or overwritten. The new instruction, while also true, is less specific and might lead developers to believe that editing the file is acceptable, which would contradict the intended workflow. Reverting to the original text would be clearer.
## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
|
|
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 4 minutesRan com.liferay.source.formatter at released version 1.0.1539. Click here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: master-temp-pr-1758826890990 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
|
Jenkins Build:test-portal-source-format#7417 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:sf Pull Request:liferay#6512 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build ID: 326918260Testray Importer:test-portal-source-format#7417 |
✔️ ci:test:dummy - 4 out of 4 jobs passed in 26 minutesClick here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Upstream Comparison:Branch GIT ID: 722c54766ea49dd747e51ed02bd850673820d0c2 ci:test:dummy - 4 out of 4 jobs PASSED4 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.Test bundle downloads: |
|
Jenkins Build:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)#14662 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:dummy Pull Request:liferay#6512 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build ID: 326945306Testray Importer:test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)#14662 |
Sources: