Feat: Add Mandatory Domain checkbox to QuestDetailsForm and update Cr… #1086
Conversation
…eateQuest and UpdateQuest types
|
@Snehagupta1907 is attempting to deploy a commit to the LFG Labs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm warn config production Use WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new "Mandatory Domain" feature for quest creation and management. It adds a checkbox in the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
types/backTypes.d.ts (1)
Type inconsistency detected in mandatory_domain field implementation
The field implementation shows inconsistencies that need to be addressed:
- Main type in backTypes.d.ts uses
string | null- Other types use
boolean | null- UI implementation toggles between
nulland"none"string valueThe field appears to be new with no existing database usage, but the type inconsistency should be standardized before proceeding.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
179-199: Verify handling of existing quests.Let's ensure the UI properly handles existing quests with different mandatory_domain values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing usage of mandatory_domain in the codebase echo "Searching for mandatory_domain usage in API handlers..." rg -A 5 "mandatory_domain.*=|mandatory_domain.*:" --type ts echo "Searching for mandatory_domain in database queries..." rg -A 5 "mandatory_domain" --type sql echo "Searching for related test cases..." rg -A 5 "mandatory_domain" --type testLength of output: 2383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SQL files and quest-related operations echo "Searching for SQL files..." fd -e sql echo "Searching for mandatory_domain in test files..." rg -A 5 "mandatory_domain" "**/*test*" echo "Searching for quest table operations..." rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*quest|ALTER TABLE.*quest" -g "*.sql"Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Prisma schema and database operations echo "Searching for Prisma schema..." fd "schema.prisma" echo "Searching for mandatory_domain in test files..." rg -A 5 "mandatory_domain" -g "*test*.ts" -g "*test*.tsx" -g "*spec*.ts" -g "*spec*.tsx" echo "Searching for quest-related database operations in TypeScript files..." rg -A 10 "model Quest|interface Quest|type Quest" -g "*.ts" -g "*.prisma"Length of output: 3942
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/admin/formSteps/QuestDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)types/backTypes.d.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/admin/formSteps/QuestDetailsForm.tsx (1)
179-199: LGTM! Well-structured UI implementation.The checkbox implementation follows good practices:
- Proper accessibility with label and id association
- Clear helper text explaining the feature
- Consistent styling with other checkboxes
types/backTypes.d.ts (1)
293-293: LGTM! Clean type definitions.The mandatory_domain property is well-defined:
- Optional property (?) allows backward compatibility
- Union type (boolean | null) appropriately represents the tri-state nature
- Consistently added to both CreateQuest and UpdateQuest types
Also applies to: 318-318
| checked={questInput.mandatory_domain === null} | ||
| onChange={(e) => { | ||
| setQuestInput((prev: any) => ({ | ||
| ...prev, | ||
| mandatory_domain: e.target.checked ? null : "none", | ||
| })); | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix type inconsistency in mandatory_domain handling.
The implementation uses null vs "none" string, but the type definition in backTypes.d.ts expects boolean | null. This mismatch could cause type errors and confusion.
Apply this diff to align with the type definition:
- checked={questInput.mandatory_domain === null}
- onChange={(e) => {
- setQuestInput((prev: any) => ({
- ...prev,
- mandatory_domain: e.target.checked ? null : "none",
- }));
+ checked={questInput.mandatory_domain === true}
+ onChange={(e) => {
+ setQuestInput((prev: any) => ({
+ ...prev,
+ mandatory_domain: e.target.checked ? true : null,
+ }));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| checked={questInput.mandatory_domain === null} | |
| onChange={(e) => { | |
| setQuestInput((prev: any) => ({ | |
| ...prev, | |
| mandatory_domain: e.target.checked ? null : "none", | |
| })); | |
| }} | |
| checked={questInput.mandatory_domain === true} | |
| onChange={(e) => { | |
| setQuestInput((prev: any) => ({ | |
| ...prev, | |
| mandatory_domain: e.target.checked ? true : null, | |
| })); | |
| }} |
close: #1017
Summary by CodeRabbit