This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 24, 2020. It is now read-only.
Regenerated Gemspec #33
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I've just fixed the .gemspec - that included a wrong
FileList- and regenerated it using Jeweler.Moreover, the removal of
require 'rake'from the .gemspec fixes a bug when deploying with bundler+capistrano (including the RakeFileUtils module into Object defines Object#install, bundler wants to define an install task, but Capistrano refuses because there's already an #install method :-).Can you pull, please?
Thank you,
~Marcello