Skip to content

Revert range-based loops change #164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

aobolensk
Copy link
Member

@aobolensk aobolensk commented Jan 7, 2025

Windows OpenMP does not support range-based loops

@aobolensk aobolensk force-pushed the range-based branch 3 times, most recently from 2be7dc5 to 162c039 Compare January 7, 2025 18:53
@aobolensk aobolensk self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.75%. Comparing base (4ed6881) to head (dd902aa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #164   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.75%   96.75%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines         585      585           
  Branches      174      174           
=======================================
  Hits          566      566           
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials       17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aobolensk aobolensk force-pushed the range-based branch 2 times, most recently from 487c5f2 to d2a4e7a Compare January 7, 2025 21:10
Windows OpenMP does not support range-based loops
@aobolensk aobolensk requested a review from allnes January 7, 2025 21:15
@allnes allnes merged commit 987a6a5 into learning-process:master Jan 7, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants