-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Use storage class from annotation for host-assisted PVC operation #3585
Open
TheRealSibasishBehera
wants to merge
1
commit into
kubevirt:main
Choose a base branch
from
TheRealSibasishBehera:feat/snapshot-restore-sc-selection
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this only covers the non-CSI path (
initLegacyClone
), I assume you're more interested in the CSI one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes I made are for cases where TempHostAssistedSourcePvc is created, i.e., the csi driver is not present, or the csi driver for the source and target is mismatched. IIRC both are triggered by initLegacyClone . the first one is my use case
happy to work on any similar cases. Are you referring to the remaining case, which is the csi driver for target pvc and snapshot match? It tries for a direct snapshot to target pvc restore , but it fails because of a csi incompatibility issue ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh right, I forgot the issue details. Let me stress again that what you're describing is very unusual today
Yes, here's a ref to this path
containerized-data-importer/pkg/controller/clone/planner.go
Line 835 in dcf7cfb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! I will work on this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So just to poke at the setup a little bit again, the provisioner has VolumeSnapshots support (which I thought implies it's CSI) but there's no CSIDriver object?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are filled in as parameters for the storage class (not exactly the same names but similar functionality that made it possible before GA, I believe). I have confirmed with their community that they do not have a
CSIDriver
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so its not evaluated on fly for each dv/pvc ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand the motivation to avoid a CSIDriver object.. AFAIK it's a requirement https://kubernetes-csi.github.io/docs/csi-driver-object.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's evaluated prior to PVC creation to understand if we can use populators
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I agree it’s a standard and should be supported 😞
This seems like a case of delayed adoption to me, as it used to work without it