Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Archive SIG Node meeting notes and ci subgroup notes. #8244

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1,102 changes: 1,102 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2020.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

859 changes: 859 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2021.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

536 changes: 536 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2022.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

646 changes: 646 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2023.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

744 changes: 744 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2024.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/ci-subgroup-notes-2025.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
# Kubernetes SIG-Node CI subgroup notes

## Jan 8, 2025
Hosts:
Tests:
Bugs triaging

Agenda:

- Test-Infra Cleanup
- NodeSpecialFeature / NodeAlphaFeature has been dropped and CI looks great
- Replicate NodeFeature and Feature
- [https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129166](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129166)
- CI Containerd 2 migration
- [https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/34063](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/34063)
- Job config generation
- [https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/34010](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/34010)
886 changes: 886 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/meeting-notes-2024.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions sig-node/archive/meeting-notes-2025.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# SIG Node Meeting Notes

## Jan 14, 2025

* \[Tim Allclair\] Changing the CRI contract for `UpdateContainerResources`, to require it to not intentionally restart a container. Redefine (and probably rename) the "NotRequired" resize restart policy to match, meaning containers won't be deliberately restarted (could still trigger an OOM). Runtimes that can't support in-place resize should return an error (e.g. VM runtimes).

## Jan 7, 2025

* \[Tim Allclair\] Shrinking memory limits bellow memory usage (in-place resize)
* See [In Place Pod Resize - Handling Memory Limit Decreases](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cEFLXKwNOSNLAkzyhoJUgkBW0OiX-9bXB_aJV7OAypw/edit?tab=t.0)
* \[sergey\] to not interrupt the flow posting some questions:
* should we disable resize on cgroupv1 to avoid diff behavior?
* Mrunal: true, but we like the v1 behavior better
* How VPA can use the feature safely? This is another example of VPA cannot guarantee non-disruptive pod resize (best effort)
* Tim to follow up with VPA folks
* All checks suggested still have possibility for the race condition, the user experience will be super annoying. Should we reconsider the application of memory.high?
* Mrunal: Ask Waiman (Red Hat memory subsystem maintainer) if switching to v1 behavior is possible
* Peter: we probably need to do this to fully avoid TOCTOU / OOM kills
* Tim: Pause container to avoid TOCTOU?
* \[Tim Allclair\] Pod generation, status generation (design proposal)
* See proposal section of[\[PUBLIC\] Design proposal: Pod ResizeStatus Improvements](https://docs.google.com/document/d/10m0vdWbjqF_q_f1_N3gVOD5YeNn09BwFcVVycG_MoEY/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.3rtsrq1ip5xv)
* \[Zeel Patel\] [https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/129447](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/129447)
* Create a KEP PR: [https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/5022](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/5022)
* \[fromani\] I’d be happy to review
* \[HirazawaUi\]: Addressing the Issue of Slow Pod State Transitions When Evented PLEG is Enabled
* Due to the time zone difference, I regret that I am unable to attend the meeting. I have compiled the entire process of how @hshiina and I attempted to address this issue, as well as my proposal, into a detailed document: [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TPrY56q9MNW8r1FuzKDFkBBhOjQ0hqi7wJAbIP1O-4g](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TPrY56q9MNW8r1FuzKDFkBBhOjQ0hqi7wJAbIP1O-4g). I sincerely hope this can be discussed during the meeting.
* \[SergeyKanzhelev\] [Kubernetes feature development and Container runtimes](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y42XrUPrm-6DZby1RQjexYYoNn822IRR6igsOiy_62c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.2bbangbf1ha4)
* State containderd and cri-o explicitly
* \[kannon92\] [Deprecation of NodeFeature in sig-node testing](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129166)
* \[marquiz\] KEP-4112 Pass down resources to CRI, request for review:
[https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/4113](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/4113)
* 1.33 time is coming\! [https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/pull/2706/](https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/pull/2706/files)