-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] ⚠️ Allow specifying a different credentials per VSphereMachine #3353
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] ⚠️ Allow specifying a different credentials per VSphereMachine #3353
Conversation
…ulting to this indentity if it exists.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @GabQ-Bib! |
|
Hi @GabQ-Bib. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
I can see several way of implementing the feature:
I'm still in the process of testing whether this implementation fixes the issue in a satisfactory manner for my use case. In the meantime I would love if you could find the time to do a quick overview of my proposal and provide insights. |
/retitle [WIP] |
… and defaulting to this identity if it exists.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds support for configuring a VsphereIdentity in the vspheremachine / vspherevm objects, which the controller will use when looking for credentials to contact the vcenter with. This appears to be a good solution to the issue mentioned below, because these objects already carry the server name & thumbprint so it makes sense they also carry the credentials.
This PR is a rewrite of the PR originally proposed by farodin91.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #1720