Skip to content

Conversation

andyatmiami
Copy link
Contributor

ℹ️ NO GH ISSUE

After discussion with the Kubeflow WG lead - concerns were raised about including linux/s390x support in our multi-arch builds for the following reasons:

  • not clear we could in good faith support this system due to lack of hardware / potential emulation issues
  • not clear there is enough of a need from community to support linux/s390x for Kubeflow Notebooks.

As a result - we are going to remove the linux/s390x target from our multi-arch builds logic for all the workspaces components.

Additionally, included a minor fix to explicitly specify the v8 variant of linux/arm64. Today linux/arm64 and linux/arm64/v8 are essentially the same - but that could change if there was ever a v9 variant introduced. As such - opting to be explicit here.

After discussion with the Kubeflow WG lead - concerns were raised about including `linux/s390x` support in our multi-arch builds for the following reasons:
- not clear we could in good faith support this system due to lack of hardware / potential emulation issues
- not clear there is enough of a need from community to support `linux/s390x` for Kubeflow Notebooks.

As a result - we are going to remove the `linux/s390x` target from our multi-arch builds logic.

Additionally, included a minor fix to explicitly specify the `v8` variant of `linux/arm64`.  Today `linux/arm64` and `linux/arm64/v8` are essentially the same - but that could change if there was ever a `v9` variant introduced.  As such - opting to be explicit here.

Signed-off-by: Andy Stoneberg <[email protected]>
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kimwnasptd for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added the area/backend area - related to backend components label Sep 5, 2025
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added the area/controller area - related to controller components label Sep 5, 2025
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot requested a review from paulovmr September 5, 2025 14:19
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added area/frontend area - related to frontend components area/v2 area - version - kubeflow notebooks v2 size/XS labels Sep 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/backend area - related to backend components area/controller area - related to controller components area/frontend area - related to frontend components area/v2 area - version - kubeflow notebooks v2 size/XS
Projects
Status: Needs Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant