Skip to content

Add Vercel Eve extension integration doc - #451

Merged
dprevoznik merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
hypeship/vercel-eve-extension
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Add Vercel Eve extension integration doc#451
dprevoznik merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
hypeship/vercel-eve-extension

Conversation

@dprevoznik

@dprevoznik dprevoznik commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds a new integration page for the @onkernel/eve-extension package under the Vercel section — a Vercel Eve extension that mounts a Kernel cloud browser into an Eve agent with a one-line mount.

The page covers:

  • What the extension does (packages an MCP connection to Kernel's hosted MCP server; tools discovered at runtime)
  • Prerequisites (Node 24+, Eve >= 0.25, Kernel account)
  • Recommended setup via Vercel Connect (per-user auth, no key in your app)
  • The full toolset exposed under the mount, plus the browse skill
  • Both auth models (Vercel Connect vs shared API key) and the API-key setup path
  • Advanced connection override for widening the tool allowlist or adding an approval gate
  • A security callout on blast radius for shared-key / multi-tenant deployments

Changes

  • New page: integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx
  • Added it to the Vercel nav group in docs.json
  • Updated integrations/vercel/overview.mdx to list the extension as a third option (intro + card)

Internal doc links verified against existing pages (/auth/overview, /auth/profiles, /proxies/overview, /browsers/live-view, /introduction/create). docs.json validated as JSON. Did not run mintlify dev locally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only changes with no runtime, auth, or API behavior changes.

Overview
Adds documentation for mounting @onkernel/eve-extension on Vercel Eve agents so Kernel’s cloud browser tools and the browse skill appear via a one-line mount and hosted MCP.

The new integrations/vercel/eve-extension page documents Vercel Connect (recommended) vs KERNEL_API_KEY, prerequisites (Node 24+, Eve ≥ 0.25), the default toolset and opt-in high-blast-radius tools, connection overrides (allowlist + approval), and a multi-tenant security warning. docs.json registers the page under the Vercel nav group, and integrations/vercel/overview now lists Eve as a third integration path with a matching Next Steps card (3-column layout).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c5c3d24. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Kernel 🟢 Ready View Preview Jul 21, 2026, 1:14 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

@dprevoznik
dprevoznik marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 01:15
cursor[bot]
cursor Bot approved these changes Jul 21, 2026
Comment thread integrations/vercel/overview.mdx Outdated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low

The current diff only adds a Mintlify documentation page, links it into docs.json, and updates the Vercel integration overview. The update since the prior approval only restructures feature copy into bullets and trims a redundant list; it doesn't increase risk. No runtime code, model instruction files, infrastructure, authentication enforcement, permissions, or production data paths are changed, and the repository has no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner review.

This PR is already approved, so I did not submit another approval.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

Comment thread integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx Outdated
Comment thread integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx Outdated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low

The current diff changes only the Mintlify documentation surface: it adds one MDX integration guide, registers that page in docs.json, and updates the Vercel overview. The changes since the prior approval only convert prose to bullets and rename a heading with its anchor; they don't increase risk. Although the guide describes an agent skill, it doesn't modify a prompt or any model-consumed instruction file. No runtime code, infrastructure, authentication enforcement, permissions, or production data paths change, and the repository contains no CODEOWNERS file.

The PR is already approved, so I retained the existing approval and did not submit another one.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

…able

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low

The full diff only changes the Mintlify documentation surface: it adds one MDX integration guide, registers it in docs.json, and updates the Vercel overview. The latest update only tightens prose, punctuation, list formatting, and removes a redundant comparison table; it doesn't increase risk. No runtime code, model instruction files, infrastructure, authentication enforcement, permissions, or production data paths change. The repository also has no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner review.

The PR is already approved, so I retained the existing approval and did not submit another one.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 24a7cef. Configure here.

Comment thread integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx Outdated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low

The full diff is limited to the Mintlify documentation surface: one new MDX integration guide, one navigation entry in docs.json, and updates to the Vercel overview. The latest synchronization only reformats and clarifies an existing security warning; it doesn't increase the change's risk. No runtime code, model instruction files, infrastructure, authentication enforcement, permissions, or production data paths change. The repository also has no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner review.

The PR is already approved, so I retained the existing approval and did not submit another one.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

@AnnaXWang AnnaXWang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small nits

Comment thread integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx Outdated
Comment thread integrations/vercel/eve-extension.mdx
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low

The full diff is confined to the Mintlify documentation surface: it adds one MDX integration guide, registers that guide in docs.json, and updates the Vercel overview. The latest synchronization changes only three documentation phrases from “one-line mount” to “1 loc,” so it does not increase risk. No runtime code, model instruction files, infrastructure, authentication enforcement, permissions, or production data paths change. The repository also has no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner review.

The PR is already approved, so I retained the existing approval and did not submit another one.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

@dprevoznik
dprevoznik merged commit 9e7ddeb into main Jul 21, 2026
4 checks passed
@dprevoznik
dprevoznik deleted the hypeship/vercel-eve-extension branch July 21, 2026 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants