Skip to content

Security: japperJ/copilot-cv-analyzer

SECURITY.md

Security Analysis - CV Analyzer (Local Desktop Only)

Analysis Date: January 23, 2026
Deployment Context: Local desktop only, no external access
Risk Level: LOW (local-only deployment significantly reduces attack surface)


Executive Summary

Overall Security Posture: GOOD for local-only deployment
Critical Vulnerabilities: None found
Dependency Vulnerabilities: 0 (npm audit clean)
⚠️ Recommendations: 7 improvements suggested (mostly best practices)

For a local-only desktop application, this app has a strong security foundation. The threat model is significantly reduced compared to internet-facing applications, as the primary concerns shift from external attackers to:

  1. Local data protection
  2. Credential management
  3. Safe file processing
  4. Dependency integrity

Threat Model: Local Desktop Only

What We're NOT Worried About

External Network Attacks: App runs on localhost only
DDoS/Rate Limiting: No external access
SQL Injection: No database
Session Hijacking: No user authentication
CSRF: No state-changing operations from external sources
Man-in-the-Middle: All traffic is localhost

What We ARE Concerned About

Credential Exposure: GitHub Copilot tokens
File Processing: Malicious PDF/TXT files
Dependency Vulnerabilities: Third-party packages
Data Leakage: CV/Job Description in memory or logs
Local File System Access: PDF.js worker file
Supply Chain: npm packages integrity


Security Assessment by Category

1. Authentication & Credentials ⚠️ MEDIUM PRIORITY

Current State

  • Uses GitHub Copilot CLI authentication (stored by CLI tool)
  • Optional environment variables (COPILOT_TOKEN, GITHUB_TOKEN)
  • No hardcoded secrets in code ✅

Findings

GOOD: No credentials in source code
GOOD: .env.local is in .gitignore
GOOD: Uses CLI authentication (managed by GitHub)
⚠️ MEDIUM: Environment variables example file exists (.env.local.example)

Recommendations

  1. Ensure .env files are never committed

    • Already in .gitignore
    • Consider adding .env* to be extra safe
  2. Use CLI authentication (recommended)

    # User should authenticate via CLI
    copilot auth login
  3. If using environment variables, document secure storage

    • On Windows: User profile directory only
    • File permissions: Owner read-only
    • Never share across network drives

Risk Level: LOW

  • Local-only deployment reduces credential theft risk
  • User is responsible for their own desktop security

2. File Upload & Processing ✅ LOW RISK

Current State

  • Accepts PDF files for CV upload
  • Accepts PDF/TXT files for job descriptions
  • Client-side processing using PDF.js
  • File size limit: 10MB

Findings

GOOD: File type validation (PDF only for CV)
GOOD: File size limits (10MB)
GOOD: Client-side processing (no server file uploads)
GOOD: No file persistence (files processed in memory)
GOOD: Uses well-maintained PDF.js library (v5.4.530)
GOOD: No eval() or dangerouslySetInnerHTML found

Security Features

// File validation
if (file.type !== 'application/pdf') {
  return { valid: false, error: 'Please upload a PDF file' };
}

const maxSize = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB
if (file.size > maxSize) {
  return { valid: false, error: 'File size must be less than 10MB' };
}

Potential Risks

⚠️ VERY LOW: Malicious PDF exploitation

  • PDF.js runs in browser sandbox
  • No server-side execution
  • Would require browser vulnerability + malicious PDF
  • Local-only deployment limits exposure

Recommendations

  1. Consider adding PDF signature validation (optional)

    • Verify PDF header magic bytes
    • Detect corrupted files early
  2. Add file content sanitization (nice-to-have)

    // Example: Limit extracted text length
    if (fullText.length > 100000) { // ~100KB of text
      throw new Error('CV text too large');
    }
  3. Monitor PDF.js updates

    • Keep pdfjs-dist dependency updated
    • Check for security advisories

Risk Level: VERY LOW

  • Client-side processing is secure
  • Browser sandbox provides protection
  • Local-only deployment minimizes attack surface

3. Data Privacy & Storage ✅ EXCELLENT

Current State

  • No database
  • No persistent storage
  • All data in memory only
  • PDF processing client-side

Findings

EXCELLENT: No data persistence
EXCELLENT: Client-side PDF extraction (data never uploaded)
EXCELLENT: No cookies or local storage for sensitive data
EXCELLENT: No logging of CV/JD content

Data Flow

User's Desktop:
1. User selects PDF file
2. Browser reads file (client-side)
3. PDF.js extracts text (in browser memory)
4. Text sent to localhost:3000 API
5. API sends to Copilot API (external)
6. Results displayed
7. User closes browser → all data lost

Recommendations

  1. Add privacy notice (documentation)

    • Explain that CV text is sent to GitHub Copilot API
    • Clarify that data is not stored locally
    • User should trust GitHub's data handling
  2. Consider adding data clearing function

    const handleClearData = () => {
      setGeneralAnalysis(null);
      setJobMatchAnalysis(null);
      setJobDescription('');
      // Clear all state
    };
  3. Warn about Copilot API data retention (documentation)

    • GitHub Copilot may log requests for service improvement
    • Users should check GitHub's privacy policy
    • For highly sensitive CVs, consider disconnecting network

Risk Level: VERY LOW

  • No local data storage
  • Only risk is transmission to GitHub Copilot API
  • User controls what they upload

4. Dependencies & Supply Chain ✅ EXCELLENT

Current State

  • 10 direct dependencies
  • npm audit: 0 vulnerabilities

Dependency Analysis

Critical Dependencies:

Package Version Security Status Risk
@github/copilot-sdk 0.1.16 ✅ Official GitHub LOW
next 16.1.4 ✅ Well-maintained LOW
react 19.2.3 ✅ Well-maintained LOW
pdfjs-dist 5.4.530 ✅ Mozilla official LOW
zod 4.3.6 ✅ Popular validation lib LOW

Findings

EXCELLENT: All dependencies from reputable sources
EXCELLENT: No known vulnerabilities (npm audit clean)
EXCELLENT: Regular version numbers (no pre-releases)
GOOD: Reasonable number of dependencies (10 direct)

Recommendations

  1. Regular dependency updates

    # Check for updates monthly
    npm outdated
    npm update
    npm audit
  2. Use package-lock.json (already in place)

    • Ensures consistent installs ✅
    • Prevents unexpected updates
  3. Consider using npm audit fix

    # Auto-fix vulnerabilities when they appear
    npm audit fix
  4. Monitor GitHub Security Advisories

    • Watch repository for Dependabot alerts
    • Subscribe to security newsletters

Risk Level: VERY LOW

  • Clean audit
  • Trusted dependencies
  • Local deployment reduces supply chain risks

5. API Security ✅ GOOD

Current State

  • Single API endpoint: POST /api/analyze
  • Input validation with Zod (partial)
  • Error handling implemented
  • No rate limiting

Findings

GOOD: Input validation for required fields
GOOD: Error messages don't leak sensitive data
GOOD: No SQL injection (no database)
GOOD: No authentication needed (local-only)
⚠️ MEDIUM: Limited input sanitization
⚠️ LOW: No rate limiting (acceptable for local use)

Input Validation

// Current validation
if (!text || typeof text !== 'string') {
  return NextResponse.json(
    { error: 'Invalid CV text provided' },
    { status: 400 }
  );
}

// Industry validation
const validIndustries = ['general', 'technology', ...];

Recommendations

  1. Add input length limits

    const MAX_CV_LENGTH = 100000; // ~100KB text
    const MAX_JD_LENGTH = 10000;  // 10KB text
    
    if (text.length > MAX_CV_LENGTH) {
      return NextResponse.json(
        { error: 'CV text too large' },
        { status: 400 }
      );
    }
  2. Sanitize text inputs (prevent injection in prompts)

    // Basic sanitization
    const sanitizeText = (text: string) => {
      return text
        .replace(/[<>]/g, '') // Remove angle brackets
        .trim()
        .slice(0, MAX_LENGTH);
    };
  3. Add request timeout

    // Prevent hanging requests
    const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
      client.stop();
      reject(new Error('Analysis timeout'));
    }, 60000); // 60 seconds
  4. Rate limiting (optional for local use)

    • Not critical for localhost
    • Could add simple debouncing on client-side

Risk Level: LOW

  • Local-only deployment makes API attacks unlikely
  • Input validation is adequate
  • Error handling is safe

6. Code Security ✅ EXCELLENT

Current State

  • TypeScript with strict mode
  • React functional components
  • No dangerous APIs used
  • ESLint configuration

Findings

EXCELLENT: No eval() usage
EXCELLENT: No dangerouslySetInnerHTML
EXCELLENT: No innerHTML manipulation
EXCELLENT: TypeScript strict mode enabled
GOOD: React best practices followed
GOOD: No hardcoded secrets

Code Quality Checks

# Searched for dangerous patterns
grep -r "eval(" .          # 0 results
grep -r "innerHTML" .       # 0 results
grep -r "dangerouslySet" .  # 0 results

Recommendations

  1. Add ESLint security plugin (optional)

    npm install --save-dev eslint-plugin-security
  2. Enable Content Security Policy (for Next.js)

    // next.config.ts
    const nextConfig = {
      async headers() {
        return [
          {
            source: '/:path*',
            headers: [
              {
                key: 'Content-Security-Policy',
                value: "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval'"
              }
            ]
          }
        ];
      }
    };
  3. Add HTTPS in production (if ever deployed externally)

    • Not needed for localhost
    • Important if deployment changes

Risk Level: VERY LOW

  • Clean code with no dangerous patterns
  • TypeScript provides type safety
  • React framework provides XSS protection

7. Process Security ✅ GOOD

Current State

  • Next.js dev server runs on localhost:3000
  • No external network bindings
  • PDF.js worker runs in Web Worker
  • Single-user application

Findings

GOOD: Binds to localhost only (not 0.0.0.0)
GOOD: Web Workers for PDF processing (isolation)
GOOD: No unnecessary permissions requested
GOOD: No background processes

Recommendations

  1. Verify localhost binding

    # Ensure dev server only binds to localhost
    npm run dev
    # Should show: http://localhost:3000
    # NOT: http://0.0.0.0:3000
  2. Close unused ports

    • Only port 3000 should be open locally
    • Check with: netstat -an | findstr 3000
  3. Kill processes when done

    # Stop the dev server when not in use
    Ctrl+C

Risk Level: VERY LOW

  • localhost binding prevents external access
  • Single-user design is appropriate

Risk Summary

Category Risk Level Priority Status
Authentication & Credentials LOW Medium ✅ Good
File Upload & Processing VERY LOW Low ✅ Excellent
Data Privacy & Storage VERY LOW High ✅ Excellent
Dependencies & Supply Chain VERY LOW Medium ✅ Excellent
API Security LOW Low ✅ Good
Code Security VERY LOW High ✅ Excellent
Process Security VERY LOW Low ✅ Good

Overall Risk: VERY LOW


Recommended Actions

High Priority (Do Now)

  1. DONE: Verify .env.local is in .gitignore
  2. DONE: Run npm audit (0 vulnerabilities found)
  3. 📝 TODO: Add input length validation to API
  4. 📝 TODO: Document that CV data is sent to GitHub Copilot API

Medium Priority (Do Soon)

  1. 📝 TODO: Add text sanitization to API inputs
  2. 📝 TODO: Set up dependency update schedule (monthly)
  3. 📝 TODO: Add PDF header validation

Low Priority (Nice to Have)

  1. 📝 TODO: Add Content Security Policy headers
  2. 📝 TODO: Add ESLint security plugin
  3. 📝 TODO: Add "Clear All Data" button to UI
  4. 📝 TODO: Add request timeout to API calls

Security Checklist for Users

Before Using the App

  • Ensure you're on a trusted network (or offline)
  • Verify GitHub Copilot CLI is authenticated
  • Check that port 3000 is not exposed externally
  • Update dependencies (npm update)

During Use

  • Only upload CVs you're comfortable sending to GitHub API
  • Don't upload highly confidential company information
  • Close browser when done to clear memory
  • Don't share localhost URL with others on network

After Use

  • Close the development server (Ctrl+C)
  • Clear browser cache if desired
  • Log out of GitHub Copilot CLI if shared machine

Compliance Considerations

GDPR (if processing EU data)

Data Minimization: Only processes necessary data
No Storage: Data not stored locally
⚠️ Third-Party Processing: Data sent to GitHub Copilot API
📝 Privacy Policy: Should document GitHub's data handling

Local Data Protection

No Database: No local data storage
Memory Only: All processing in RAM
No Logs: CV content not logged


Incident Response Plan

If Credentials are Compromised

  1. Revoke GitHub token immediately
    copilot auth logout
  2. Generate new tokens
  3. Update local configuration

If Malicious PDF is Suspected

  1. Close the browser immediately
  2. Restart the application
  3. Run antivirus scan on the PDF file
  4. Report to Mozilla if PDF.js vulnerability suspected

If Dependency Vulnerability is Found

  1. Run npm audit
  2. Apply fixes: npm audit fix
  3. Rebuild: npm run build
  4. Test functionality

Conclusion

Security Strengths ✅

  1. Clean dependency audit (0 vulnerabilities)
  2. No dangerous code patterns (eval, innerHTML, etc.)
  3. Client-side processing (enhanced privacy)
  4. No data persistence (memory only)
  5. localhost-only deployment (minimal attack surface)
  6. Well-maintained dependencies (React, Next.js, PDF.js)

Areas for Improvement ⚠️

  1. Input validation could be more comprehensive
  2. Should document data flow to GitHub API
  3. Could add Content Security Policy headers
  4. Could implement text sanitization

Final Assessment

For a local-only desktop application, this is SECURE.

The threat model is very limited, and the existing security measures are appropriate for the deployment context. The recommended improvements are mostly best practices rather than critical fixes.

Recommended Security Level: Production-ready for local desktop use.


Security Analyst: GitHub Copilot
Review Date: January 23, 2026
Next Review: In 3 months or after major updates

There aren’t any published security advisories