Skip to content

Comments from Mark Taylor added #19

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Comments from Mark Taylor added #19

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

aibaiba
Copy link
Collaborator

@aibaiba aibaiba commented May 30, 2025

No description provided.

gmantele
gmantele previously approved these changes May 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gmantele gmantele left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks OK to me. But let's wait for Mark review before merging as he is the comments author.

Note that the "../v1.3" is correct in the xmlns attribute, even
though the VOTable version is 1.5.
Copy link
Member

@mbtaylor mbtaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made a validity fix to the example VOTable in section 5.

Other than that it looks good with one exception: the t_validity field is documented as mandatory, but it does not appear in the example response in section 5. Either downgrade t_validity to optional or add a suitable column to the VOTable.

confidence of the validity range, with one of the following allowed
\begin{itemize}
\item {A numeric field with name="\textbf{t\_validity}" \textbf{MUST} be present
with utype=" \textbf{Char.TimeAxis.Coverage.Time}" and unit="d", containing the date when the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the second time, I am submitting the same review comment: Please remove the space after utype=".

@@ -278,40 +279,32 @@ \subsubsection{Required parameters}

\begin{itemize}
\item{\textbf{MAXREC}\\MAXREC parameter is defined in DALI and allows
the client to limit the number or records in the response. A service
the client to limit the number of records in the response. A service
implementation may also impose default and maximum values for this limit.
However, the limit is determined, if the output is truncated due to the

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
However, the limit is determined, if the output is truncated due to the
However the limit is determined, if the output is truncated due to the

Since this is a subordinate clause, the comma should appear after the clause and not the subordinating conjunction.

Comment on lines 303 to 308
to check for object observability. The unit of \textbf{TIME} parameter must be
expressed in MJD. The format of the range list is the one defined by other
IVOA S*APs protocols like SSAP \citep{std:SSAP}, where the format of a
IVOA S*APs protocols like SSAP \citep{2012ivoa.spec.0210T}, where the format of a
range is defined by '$t_{min}\slash t_{max}$'. If the range is defined
as an open range without the lower value of the range like '$\slash t_{max}$',
as an open range without the lower value of the range like '$t_{max}$',
$t_{min}$ will be interpreted as now.\\
Copy link

@jwfraustro jwfraustro Jun 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think the reference to the other Simple protocols is entirely correct or, at least, may be confusing to the reader.

For TIME:

  • SSA does indicate its range-list values this way, with a /, but uses ISO-8601.
  • SIA's TIME does use MJD, but indicates its range-lists with a space.

Maybe it's best to drop the reference entirely? Either place the reader looks, the examples would be incorrect.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since RESPONSEFORMAT is implied as being supported in Sec 4.1, perhaps it should be added to the Non-compulsory Parameters section?

\hline
\textbf{moon\_sep\_min} & \textbf{(MAY)} & phys.angDist & Minimum
\textbf{moon\_sep\_min} & \textbf{(MAY)} & & Minimum
Moon separation for this sky position and observability time interval &
float & deg \\

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like moon_sep_min was missed as a numeric.

Suggested change
float & deg \\
numeric & deg \\

@@ -798,7 +760,7 @@ \section{ObjObsSAP data model summary}
\textbf{em\_min} & \textbf{Char.Spectral.Axis.Energy.Min \newline
(MAY)} &
em.energy & Energy minimum for this particular sky position and
observability time interval & float & m \\
observability time interval & numeric & m \\

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should em_max be a numeric as well? See moon_sep_min comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants