Skip to content

[CI][Benchmarks] add mako to requirements #17882

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pbalcer
Copy link
Contributor

@pbalcer pbalcer commented Apr 7, 2025

Mako is required for building IGC from source.

@pbalcer pbalcer requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2025 09:59
@pbalcer pbalcer temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock April 7, 2025 09:59 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@pbalcer pbalcer temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock April 7, 2025 10:18 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@pbalcer pbalcer temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock April 7, 2025 10:18 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Mako is required for building IGC from source.
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ matplotlib==3.9.2
mpld3==0.5.10
dataclasses-json==0.6.7
PyYAML==6.0.1
Mako==1.3.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that all third-party requirements dependencies could be resolved by their requirements.txt files. Can the llvm bench scripts call pip with relevant requirements.txt files instead? With this, we wouldn't have to worry about possible dependencies updates, just install what third-parties need.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that all third-party requirements dependencies could be resolved by their requirements.txt files.

I couldn't find one for IGC. This didn't change though - mako just happened to be already installed in most scenarios because UR has it in its requirements.txt ;) I just stumbled on this when building on a fresh system.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok if there is none for IGC.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants