Skip to content

Add openGauss DataVec support #7037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lauraty123
Copy link

@lauraty123 lauraty123 commented Apr 15, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

This PR adds support for openGauss DataVec as a document engine option in RAGFlow.
Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR.

  • Added openGauss container-related configurations
  • Adapt the basic CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionality for openGauss.
  • Adapt the full-text search and vector search functionality for openGauss.

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. 💞 feature Feature request, pull request that fullfill a new feature. labels Apr 15, 2025
@yingfeng
Copy link
Member

yingfeng commented Apr 15, 2025

Thank you, however, this PR will not be merged due to being lack of fundamental full text search capabilities. Elasticsearch is the minimum solution to to fulfill the requirements for the doc engine. Other alternatives including opensearch(similar to es), vespa, besides infinity. Except for these, none are suitable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💞 feature Feature request, pull request that fullfill a new feature. size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants