Fix left over from starter conversion changes #244
Conversation
Addresses #239 and a typo.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance = 4cm, auto] | |||
| \node [start] (init) {Take your regular or liquid starter}; | |||
| \node [start] (init) {Take your regular starter}; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| \node [start] (init) {Take your regular starter}; | |
| \node [start] (init) {Take your starter}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This process could both start with a regular or liquid starter. Both will work. So maybe just starter? Should we elaborate this further in another place?
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance = 4cm, auto] | |||
| \node [start] (init) {Take your regular or liquid starter}; | |||
| \node [start] (init) {Take your regular starter}; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This process could both start with a regular or liquid starter. Both will work. So maybe just starter? Should we elaborate this further in another place?
| @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ \section{Liquid starter}% | |||
| flavor profile from vinegary to lactic. Your starter is going to develop | |||
| dairy creamy notes. Interestingly, when changing the hydration again, your starter | |||
| is going to maintain the liquid starter flavor profile, but then benefit again | |||
| from enhanced yeast activity. The liquid starter conversion is nonreversible. | |||
| from enhanced yeast activity. The liquid starter conversion is non~reversible. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thx. I hope one day I learn when to use the ~ in LaTeX
|
I am not understanding what you mean by non-reversible then? if it is non reversible then we can’t come back from liquid to regular or stiff. If we can this is reversible by definition. |
|
ping @hendricius what do you mean by non-reversible 😺 ? thank |
|
@cedounet made a small video, hope this clarifies it a bit: https://www.loom.com/share/0d3a042323e94b978cd5f71017bdad29 |
|
Can we improve the explanation in the book somehow? Since this is something
I am sure many people don't understand.
…On Wed 4. Oct 2023 at 19:27, cedounet ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #244
<#244>.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#244 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGHNW6ONZMVYOV2FGHDDPLX5WMBXAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5J3B7DSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJQGU2TGOJRHAYTSOI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
<hendricius/the-sourdough-framework/pull/244/issue_event/10553918199@
github.com>
|
|
I think we should but that is not that PR, hence I closed it. I did not close #239 we can track improvements there. |
Addresses
#239 and a typo.