Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify Bubblegum and Taffy moves. Improve flow of Bubblegum section. [[Issue #1045]] #1060

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
May 13, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
60cda78
Rename the Taffy Double Bluff to Pestilent Bubblegum Double Bluff. Up…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
6703420
Rename the Taffy Double Bluff to Pestilent Bubblegum Bluff. Update ra…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
ac15e97
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/NZadeh/hanabi.github.io int…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
a5359af
Typo fix on slot numbers (ugh...).
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
0891446
Rename the Taffy Double Bluff to Pestilent Bubblegum Bluff. Update ra…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
b258987
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/NZadeh/hanabi.github.io int…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
a5a4f7c
Rename the Taffy Double Bluff to Pestilent Bubblegum Bluff. Update ra…
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
9b1afab
Sync.
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
0fba060
Unify Bubblegum and Taffy moves. Improve flow of Bubblegum section.
NZadeh Jan 19, 2023
f66e0e3
Unify Bubblegum and Taffy moves. Improve flow of Bubblegum section.
NZadeh Jan 18, 2023
7efb0ee
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/NZadeh/hanabi.github.io int…
NZadeh Jan 19, 2023
b25d276
Minor updates, typo fixes, etc.
NZadeh Jan 19, 2023
b78cc87
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 9, 2023
3e2a450
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 9, 2023
14787c9
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 9, 2023
5a64bfd
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 10, 2023
023c737
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 10, 2023
c05f726
fix: typo
Zamiell May 10, 2023
dc77cee
fix: typo
Zamiell May 10, 2023
e395206
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 10, 2023
19786cd
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 12, 2023
1f32cd8
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 12, 2023
052ccd6
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 12, 2023
36a233a
Update docs/variant-specific/pink.mdx
Zamiell May 12, 2023
a2140db
Update pink.mdx
Zamiell May 13, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/variant-specific/pink.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ These conventions apply to any variant with a pink (touched by all ranks) suit.
### The Bubblegum Bluff (Two-Away-From-Playable Form)

- Normally, _Bubblegum Bluffs_ are always performed by touching _one-way-from-playable_ pink cards.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I'm on mobile, so I can't easily find the old language. I really do prefer it though, as I had reviewed that multiple times already before submitting it for review.

Can you think of a less invasive way to update the old language if you feel it needs additional emphasis on the fact that other conventions like 2 saves exist?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure, suggest something using the suggest feature

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- Note that, as with a standard _Bluff_, the receiver of a _[Bubblegum Bluff](#the-bubblegum-bluff)_ marks their pink card as the lowest-possible, useful value it could be (given the team's preceding actions).
- However, it is sometimes possible that the lowest-possible, useful value is actually _two-away-from-playable_.

What about something like this? (I'll find the suggest feature shortly).

  • Got rid of "good touch" and replaced it with "useful"
  • Added "(given the team's preceding actions)" to hint at the fact that there might be blind plays, etc... a 2 save does not a bluff make :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@Zamiell Zamiell May 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that, as with a standard Bluff, the receiver of a Bubblegum Bluff marks their pink card as the lowest-possible, useful value it could be (given the team's preceding actions).

That's not how "standard" bluffs work though. After a normal bluff, the receiver marks their card as all the matching one-away-from-playable cards. And if we are including all bluffs, then the receiver marks their card as that + all of the N arbitrary bluffs that were previously agreed upon before the game started (3 bluff, critical 4 bluff, etc.)

Copy link
Collaborator

@Zamiell Zamiell May 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Continuing: Trash bluffs exist, and trash bluffs are done with 1's, so correct me if I am wrong, but the "lowest rank" of the card isn't really relevant, its the N-away-from-playable part.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@NZadeh NZadeh May 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it be clearer to hyperlink the text to the bluff docs? https://hanabi.github.io/docs/level-11#the-bluff

I used the word "standard" to not have to worry about all of those other bluffs. is there another word you'd like better?

The "lowest rank" matters when determining the possible values of the target of a bubblegum move. For example, on turn 1, Alice gives Cathy a "2" clue focusing slot 1. Bob blind plays red 1 from slot 2. What is Cathy's note?

"Logically" it could be i3, i4, or i5 (not i1 as Bob would have played from slot 1, and not i2 as Bob would have played from slot 1). We agree that it's the lowest rank of these, in this case i3.

(EDIT: I should add it's obviously not any non-pink/non-omni card -- as no other conventions would result in Bob blind playing from slot 2.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Normally, _Bubblegum Bluffs_ are always performed by touching _one-way-from-playable_ pink cards.
- Note that, as with a standard _Bluff_, the receiver of a _[Bubblegum Bluff](#the-bubblegum-bluff)_ marks their pink card as the lowest-possible, useful value it could be (given the team's preceding actions).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could also drop the leading "Note that, ..." and start with "As with a standard Bluff, ...."

- Rarely, it is possible to perform a _Bubblegum Bluff_ on a _two-away-from-playable_ pink card. However, this can only be done in a specific situation where if the clued card to be _one-way-from-playable_, it would not work out.
- However, it is sometimes possible that the lowest-possible, useful value is actually _two-away-from-playable_.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a heads up that the language "lowest-possible, useful value" here might be incomplete/lack context if we aren't also taking the rewrite suggestion for the first line.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"...lowest-possible, useful value of a focused pink card is actually..." ?

- For example, in a 3-player game:
- It is the first turn and nothing is played on the stacks.
- Alice clues number 2 to Cathy, touching a pink 3 on slot 3 as a _Play Clue_. (The pink 3 is currently _two-away-from-playable_.)
Expand Down