-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify Bubblegum and Taffy moves. Improve flow of Bubblegum section. [[Issue #1045]] #1060
Changes from 1 commit
60cda78
6703420
ac15e97
a5359af
0891446
b258987
a5a4f7c
9b1afab
0fba060
f66e0e3
7efb0ee
b25d276
b78cc87
3e2a450
14787c9
5a64bfd
023c737
c05f726
dc77cee
e395206
19786cd
1f32cd8
052ccd6
36a233a
a2140db
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ These conventions apply to any variant with a pink (touched by all ranks) suit. | |||||
### The Bubblegum Bluff (Two-Away-From-Playable Form) | ||||||
|
||||||
- Normally, _Bubblegum Bluffs_ are always performed by touching _one-way-from-playable_ pink cards. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could also drop the leading "Note that, ..." and start with "As with a standard Bluff, ...."
NZadeh marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||
- Rarely, it is possible to perform a _Bubblegum Bluff_ on a _two-away-from-playable_ pink card. However, this can only be done in a specific situation where if the clued card to be _one-way-from-playable_, it would not work out. | ||||||
- However, it is sometimes possible that the lowest-possible, useful value is actually _two-away-from-playable_. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. just a heads up that the language "lowest-possible, useful value" here might be incomplete/lack context if we aren't also taking the rewrite suggestion for the first line. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "...lowest-possible, useful value of a focused pink card is actually..." ? |
||||||
- For example, in a 3-player game: | ||||||
- It is the first turn and nothing is played on the stacks. | ||||||
- Alice clues number 2 to Cathy, touching a pink 3 on slot 3 as a _Play Clue_. (The pink 3 is currently _two-away-from-playable_.) | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I'm on mobile, so I can't easily find the old language. I really do prefer it though, as I had reviewed that multiple times already before submitting it for review.
Can you think of a less invasive way to update the old language if you feel it needs additional emphasis on the fact that other conventions like 2 saves exist?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure, suggest something using the suggest feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about something like this? (I'll find the suggest feature shortly).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not how "standard" bluffs work though. After a normal bluff, the receiver marks their card as all the matching one-away-from-playable cards. And if we are including all bluffs, then the receiver marks their card as that + all of the N arbitrary bluffs that were previously agreed upon before the game started (3 bluff, critical 4 bluff, etc.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Continuing: Trash bluffs exist, and trash bluffs are done with 1's, so correct me if I am wrong, but the "lowest rank" of the card isn't really relevant, its the N-away-from-playable part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would it be clearer to hyperlink the text to the bluff docs? https://hanabi.github.io/docs/level-11#the-bluff
I used the word "standard" to not have to worry about all of those other bluffs. is there another word you'd like better?
The "lowest rank" matters when determining the possible values of the target of a bubblegum move. For example, on turn 1, Alice gives Cathy a "2" clue focusing slot 1. Bob blind plays red 1 from slot 2. What is Cathy's note?
"Logically" it could be i3, i4, or i5 (not i1 as Bob would have played from slot 1, and not i2 as Bob would have played from slot 1). We agree that it's the lowest rank of these, in this case i3.
(EDIT: I should add it's obviously not any non-pink/non-omni card -- as no other conventions would result in Bob blind playing from slot 2.)