Rename the Taffy Double Bluff, and update the language in Taffy Bluff [[Issue #1045]] #1058
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…date rationale for the Taffy Bluff.
…tionale for the Taffy Bluff.
…tionale for the Taffy Bluff.
…tionale for the Taffy Bluff.
|
Sorry, I think there are still issues with the rewrite that need working out. For example, it is possible to give Bubblegum-like clues on two-away-from-playables that require only 1 blind play to synchronize or might require 2 blind plays. I'll be back. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The logic behind a Taffy Double Bluff is much closer to that behind a Bubblegum Finesse or a Pestilent Double Bluff. We are renaming it as such.
The description for Taffy Bluff could benefit from logical motivation, without which it could be hard for first-time readers to understand. (I know I struggled with understanding it...) I'm hoping the new rewording makes it more intuitive.
I'm not convinced I did this right, so guidance would be welcome. Wordsmithing also welcome.
This is addressing #1045. There's probably a structured way of linking them, but I'm also not sure how to do that. Thanks!