Skip to content

ci: sweep pre-existing empty bot-opened issues on schedule - #1595

Draft
groupthinking wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
addressing-issues-grv-421-659a
Draft

ci: sweep pre-existing empty bot-opened issues on schedule#1595
groupthinking wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
addressing-issues-grv-421-659a

Conversation

@groupthinking

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Canonical issue

Closes #1548

Outcome

The empty "Addressing Issues" shells opened by linear-code[bot] before the auto-close from #1574 shipped (#1277, #1522, #1523, #1548, #1552, #1553) get closed automatically, and any future shell that slips past a failed opened run is self-healed by a weekly sweep.

Scope

  • Included: a sweep-empty-bot-issues job in issue-triage.yml (weekly cron + workflow_dispatch) that closes open bot-opened issues with an empty body, using the same criteria and comment as the existing opened handler.
  • Explicitly excluded: any change to the opened-trigger behavior; closing issues with real content or human authors.

Risk

  • Risk level: low
  • Failure mode: an issue that is bot-opened with an empty body but tracks real work gets closed as not_planned; the close comment invites reopening with a description.
  • Rollback: revert this commit.

Verification

  • YAML lint passes on the workflow file
  • Manual workflow_dispatch run after merge to perform the initial backfill

Production evidence

Not applicable — CI workflow change only; effect is observable via the dispatch run closing the six open shells listed above.

Agent handoff

  • One canonical issue is linked
  • No competing PR implements the same issue
  • Acceptance criteria are satisfied
  • Required checks pass on the current head
  • Human decision is requested only for product, security, irreversible infrastructure, or production approval

The auto-close added in #1574 only fires on issues:opened, so empty
bot-opened shells created before it shipped (e.g. #1277, #1522, #1523,
#1548, #1552, #1553) stay open forever. Add a weekly/manual sweep job
that closes open issues matching the same criteria with the same
comment.

Generated with [Linear](https://linear.app/myxstack/issue/GRV-421/addressing-issues#agent-session-146899ef)

Co-authored-by: linear-code[bot] <222613912+linear-code[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GRV-421

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
v0-uvai Canceled Canceled v0 Aug 30, 2026 11:06pm

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci/cd label Aug 30, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 2853bd2.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Files

None

@groupthinking groupthinking linked an issue Sep 8, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@groupthinking groupthinking added high-priority Urgent - blocks revenue or core functionality agent-task mcp/agent labels Sep 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

agent-task ci/cd high-priority Urgent - blocks revenue or core functionality mcp/agent

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Addressing Issues Agent help

2 participants