Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update .param_gfnff.xtb to be consistent with internal parameters #1201

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

foxtran
Copy link
Contributor

@foxtran foxtran commented Feb 26, 2025

#1103 brings inconsistency between internal parameters and parameters defined in .param_gfnff.xtb

@Thomas3R, which parameters are correct? In .param_gfnff.xtb or in source code?

Signed-off-by: Igor S. Gerasimov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor S. Gerasimov <[email protected]>
@foxtran
Copy link
Contributor Author

foxtran commented Feb 28, 2025

@Thomas3R, ping :)

@foxtran
Copy link
Contributor Author

foxtran commented Feb 28, 2025

@marcelmbn, could you please check this PR?

@Thomas3R
Copy link
Contributor

Thomas3R commented Mar 5, 2025

Thank you for noticing! I did not change the Ln parameters in the .param_gfnff.xtb file after the update for the lanthanides and adding the actinides.
Your changes for .param_gfnff.xtb are correct.

However, I guess you changed gfnff_param.f90 for debugging and need to reverse the changes before we can commit this.

@foxtran
Copy link
Contributor Author

foxtran commented Mar 5, 2025

for debugging

No, I made it for update in next time :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants