Spec edits for incremental delivery, Section 3 only

[robrichard]

Extracted from the full PR (#1110) and targeting an integration branch to aid in review.

Helpful reference material:

Response format examples: graphql/defer-stream-wg#69
Glossary: graphql/defer-stream-wg#106
GraphQL Conf talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEyDeNoobT0

[benjie]

Lots of nit-picky comments but I think we're pretty close! Do we have a glossary somewhere? I think we need to be really crisp on terms like "result", "response", "payload" and the like.

[benjie]

I believe that we've refined the terminology around this: there's one response. The response for stream/defer is a stream consisting of an initial result payload followed by a number of incremental payloads. I couldn't find where we discussed this, so please correct as appropriate.

Suggested change

	responses: the initial response containing all non-deferred data, while
	subsequent responses include deferred data.
	payloads: the initial payload containing all non-deferred data, while subsequent
	payloads include deferred data.

[robrichard]

@benjie after the last discussion we had, I decided to drop payload. The response section now says:

The result of a GraphQL request must be either a single initial response or an
incremental stream. The response will be an incremental stream when the GraphQL
service has deferred or streamed data as a result of the @defer or @stream
directives. When the result of the GraphQL operation is an incremental stream,
the first value will be an initial response, followed by one or more subsequent
responses.

[benjie]

Suggested change

	- `initialCount: Int! = 0` - The number of list items the service should return
	initially. If omitted, defaults to `0`. A field error will be raised if the
	value of this argument is less than `0`.
	- `initialCount: Int! = 0` - The number of list items to include in the initial
	result payload. If omitted, defaults to `0`. A field error will be raised if
	the value of this argument is less than `0`.

[robrichard]

I updated this to The number of list items to include initially.. I originally had something similar but there was feedback in one of the prior PRs that we shouldn't say initial response since @stream may be used inside of a @defer. The initial items in this case would not be returned in the initial response.

[benjie]

That's a good subtle catch. "Initially" is a bit weakly defined though; perhaps "The number of list items to include initially when completing the parent selection set." or something along those lines? I'm not happy with the term "completing" nor "resolving" here, mind. 🤔

[benjie]

The "and" here implies this is an additional behaviour

Suggested change

	- `if: Boolean! = true` - When `true`, field _should_ be streamed (see related
	note below). When `false`, the field must not be streamed and all list items
	must be initially included. Defaults to `true` when omitted.
	- `if: Boolean! = true` - When `true`, field _should_ be streamed (see related
	note below). When `false`, the field must behave as if the `@stream` directive
	is not present—it must not be streamed and all of the list items must be
	included. Defaults to `true` when omitted.

[benjie]

I want to make it clear that each @stream or @defer may be ignored independently of the others.

Suggested change

	that ignores the `@defer` and/or `@stream` directives. This also applies to the
	`initialCount` argument on the `@stream` directive. Clients _must_ be able to
	process a streamed response that contains a different number of initial list
	items than what was specified in the `initialCount` argument.
	that ignores individual `@defer` and/or `@stream` directives. This also applies
	to the `initialCount` argument on the `@stream` directive. Clients must be
	able to process a streamed response that contains a different number of initial
	list items than what was specified in the `initialCount` argument.

I've also removed the italics from _must_ because this is explicitly a non-normative note, and shouldn't have conformance requirements in it. If this is a conformance requirement that isn't stated elsewhere, it needs to be moved outside of the Note:.

I also think that the final sentence is worded a bit weakly... Can the server return any number of results initially, followed by any number of results in follow up payloads? I personally don't think this is ideal. If a client says @stream(initialCount: 2) then I think the server should either return at least two results in the initial result payload, and stream others; or not stream the result at all. If servers want to be able to always stream zero results they should add a lint rule to force initialCount to always be omitted or = 0.

[robrichard]

Since we had consensus in the primary WG on graphql/defer-stream-wg#104, i have updated the initialCount section above to include:

When the size of the list is greater than or equal
to the value of initialCount, the GraphQL service must initially include
at least as many list items as the value of initialCount (see related note
below).

With this text, I think it is safe to remove italics from must. I believe this note is now just stating client consequences of server behavior that is described earlier.

Additionally I updated "contains a different number of initial list items" to "contains more initial list items"

[benjie]

Right, because if it has fewer list items it's not a "streamed response"? Good thinking.

We should clarify that "response" doesn't mean the response as a whole, but just that from the field. Perhaps "streamed field response"/"streamed field result"?

[robrichard]

@benjie I added a rough glossary here: graphql/defer-stream-wg#106, I'll keep refining it as we go

[mjmahone]

These changes look correct to me, I don't think the definition of the @stream/@defer directives have changed in a very long time, so this feels good.