Skip to content

Clarify inline the CL acronym definition #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions review/reviewer/standard.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ submit an improvement to the codebase, then the codebase never improves. Also,
if a reviewer makes it very difficult for _any_ change to go in, then developers
are disincentivized to make improvements in the future.

On the other hand, it is the duty of the reviewer to make sure that each CL is
of such a quality that the overall code health of their codebase is not
decreasing as time goes on. This can be tricky, because often, codebases degrade
through small decreases in code health over time, especially when a team is
On the other hand, it is the duty of the reviewer to make sure that each
changelist (CL) is of such a quality that the overall code health of their codebase
is not decreasing as time goes on. This can be tricky, because often, codebases
degrade through small decreases in code health over time, especially when a team is
under significant time constraints and they feel that they have to take
shortcuts in order to accomplish their goals.

Expand Down