Support for ISO 9362:2022 BIC (SWIFT) codes

[fira42073]

Fixes Or Enhances

#1471

Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before you submit PR:

• Tests exist or have been written that cover this particular change.

@go-playground/validator-maintainers

[coveralls]

coverage: 73.73%. remained the same
when pulling a74c100 on fira42073:bic-iso-9362-2022
into 2d3af3d on go-playground:master.

[nodivbyzero]

Would it be better to introduce a new validator, such as bic_iso_9362, rather than modifying the existing one? This approach would preserve backward compatibility and ensure that current functionality remains unaffected.

[fira42073]

sounds good, I can do that, but fyi https://www.iso.org/standard/60390.html the standard is withdrawn, and the 2022 one is inclusive of all old BICs from 2014 one. but if we are to proceed with the namespaced versions, how should we distinguish 2014 and 2022 ones? bic_iso_9362_2014 and bic_iso_9362_2022?

[nodivbyzero]

Another option is to rename the existing one to bic_iso_9362_2014 and keep your current changes. We can also add a note/comment in the documentation to clarify this distinction.