Skip to content

Rust: Add another disjunct to postWithInFlowExclude #19195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

hvitved
Copy link
Contributor

@hvitved hvitved commented Apr 2, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Apr 2, 2025
@hvitved hvitved marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 12:01
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 2, 2025 12:01
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • rust/ql/lib/codeql/rust/dataflow/internal/DataFlowConsistency.qll: Language not supported

Tip: Copilot code review supports C#, Go, Java, JavaScript, Markdown, Python, Ruby and TypeScript, with more languages coming soon. Learn more

@hvitved hvitved requested a review from geoffw0 April 2, 2025 17:16
@@ -20,6 +21,8 @@ private module Input implements InputSig<Location, RustDataFlow> {
n.(Node::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr() = any(Node::ReceiverNode r).getReceiver()
or
n.(Node::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr() = getPostUpdateReverseStep(_, _)
or
FlowSummaryImpl::Private::Steps::sourceLocalStep(_, n, _)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this do? Why doesn't it affect any tests? Would any changes show up in a DCA run?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It affects the tests in your PR. DCA will report fewer data flow inconsistencies, but it is hardly worth spending CPU cycles on that.

Copy link
Contributor

@geoffw0 geoffw0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed - it works. :)

@hvitved hvitved merged commit ffca52e into github:main Apr 4, 2025
16 checks passed
@hvitved hvitved deleted the rust/post-with-flow-in-exclude branch April 4, 2025 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants