Repository navigation
Conversation
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @Lynndabel, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax: NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txtTo iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description): To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join git-mentoring@googlegroups.com, where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
|
There are issues in commit 3180f1d:
|
|
There are issues in commit 32d9485:
|
|
There are issues in commit a1b7d2f:
|
|
There are issues in commit d0dc9c9:
|
|
There are issues in commit c3b1b24:
|
|
/allow |
|
User Lynndabel is now allowed to use GitGitGadget. WARNING: Lynndabel has no public email address set on GitHub; GitGitGadget needs an email address to Cc: you on your contribution, so that you receive any feedback on the Git mailing list. Go to https://github.com/settings/profile to make your preferred email public to let GitGitGadget know which email address to use. |
|
@Lynndabel please note that the Git project insists on the DCO. You can fix it by configuring Also, Git's commit messages are almost never mere one-liners. Please follow the guidance in https://github.blog/2022-06-30-write-better-commits-build-better-projects/ to improve it, in particular with a strong focus on this part:
|
The diff_auto_refresh_index variable is currently a global, which makes it difficult to use Git as a library since global state can't be isolated between different repository instances. Move it into repo_config_values so that each repository can have its own setting. This follows the pattern used for other recently migrated config options like trust_executable_bit. Add a getter function repo_diff_auto_refresh_index() that returns the value from the repo's config, falling back to 1 (the default) if the repo isn't initialized yet. Update the config handler to write to the repo config struct, remove the global variable declaration, and update the caller in builtin/diff.c to use the new getter function. Add tests to verify the configuration can be set to both true and false without errors. Signed-off-by: Lynndabel <okolo.ebelelynda@gmail.com>
c3b1b24 to
97319dd
Compare
Thank you. i have committed using the guideline and pushed. |
|
@Lynndabel very good. Now try |
|
/preview |
|
Preview email sent as pull.2289.git.1793607166561.gitgitgadget@gmail.com |
|
/submit |
|
Submitted as pull.2289.git.1793607304156.gitgitgadget@gmail.com To fetch this version into To fetch this version to local tag |
|
Junio C Hamano wrote on the Git mailing list (how to reply to this email): "Ebele Lynda Okolo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:
> From: Lynndabel <okolo.ebelelynda@gmail.com>
>
> The diff_auto_refresh_index variable is currently a global,
> which makes it difficult to use Git as a library since
> global state can't be isolated between different repository
> instances.
We do not want to put it in repo_config_value, because access to the
structure will barf when given anything other than the_repository,
hence such a move does not help the "library" scene very much to
begin with.
It is only set in diff.c when the ui related configuration variable
is read from the git_config() callback. The callback is *not*
repository specific but is a synthesized computation result after
reading system, global, and repository configuration files, which is
another reason why it does not look like a good idea to tie this
setting to repo_config_values.
Thanks. |
cc: Patrick Steinhardt ps@pks.im
cc: Usman Akinyemi usmanakinyemi202@gmail.com