Ian/fluent definition

[ianmacartney]

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[ianmacartney]

fyi @thomasballinger fluent definitions work well and break the circular type errors.
I even made this an overload so you can keep providing the handler inline, or upgrade to fluent. but the overload makes for uglier type errors (the overload 1 / 2 wording, maybe not a big deal).
The other syntax I could imagine doing - which we can do in convex too - is workflow.define.args().returns().handler().
So one version we could use in convex would be:

export const myquery = query({ args, returns }).handler(async () => {});

Another would be:

export const myquery = query.args().returns().handler(async() => {});

The latter could avoid overloads.
or even query.define({ args, returns }).handler(async() => {}); - if we want to have an object to be able to add more things, e.g. the custom function extra args pattern I like.