-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
Improve dust threshold error #1423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @DRadmir, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue where non- Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to improve error handling for UniFFI by wrapping errors into GatewayError. While the goal is valid, the implementation introduces some issues. Specifically, it uses GatewayError.NetworkError for all types of errors, which is semantically incorrect and can be misleading. Additionally, the error wrapping logic is duplicated across multiple services. My review includes suggestions to use a more appropriate error type and to centralize the error handling logic to improve code quality and maintainability.
8fde989 to
a25d4eb
Compare
a83f539 to
c16338b
Compare
Introduces a new InfoSheetType for dust threshold errors and updates error handling in transfer and info sheet flows to support it. Refactors ChainCoreError to simplify dust threshold representation and error mapping. Updates localization strings for dust threshold errors and adds a new 'no data available' message in all supported languages.
a3e33ce to
29d3701
Compare
…ove-dust-threshold-error
TODO:
Fix: #1416