Gh-3153 fixing flaky test shouldConsumeGraph

[omkrpt]

What is the purpose of this PR

• Linked issue
• This PR fixes the flaky test: uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest#shouldConsumeGraph
• The test may fail or pass without changes made to the source code when it is run in different JVMs due to the non-deterministic ordering when properties are serialized.

Why the test fails

• The assertion at L98 in this test compares two instances of uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisable objects using the overridden Object.equals() method.
• However, the elements of serialisedProperties are in a non-deterministic order and cause the assertion to fail.

How to reproduce the test failure

I used a tool called nondex.

mvn install -pl core/graph -am -DskipTests
mvn -pl core/graph test -Dtest=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest#shouldConsumeGraph 
mvn -pl core/graph edu.illinois:nondex-maven-plugin:2.1.1:nondex -Dtest=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest#shouldConsumeGraph

Expected results

• The test should run successfully when run with NonDex.

Actual results
We get the following failures:

[ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.586 s <<< FAILURE! -- in uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest
[ERROR] uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest.shouldConsumeGraph -- Time elapsed: 0.577 s <<< FAILURE!
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 

expected: 
  GraphSerialisable[config=GraphConfig[graphId=testGraphId,view=View[{
    "entities" : {
      "e1" : { }
    }
  }],library=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.store.library.NoGraphLibrary@661d88a,hooks=[uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.hook.NamedViewResolver@4b0b64cc, uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.hook.FunctionAuthoriser@59ce792e]],schema=Schema[{
    "entities" : {
      "e1" : {
        "vertex" : "string"
      }
    },
    "types" : {
      "string" : {
        "class" : "java.lang.String"
      }
    }
  }],properties={gaffer.store.class=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.integration.store.TestStore, gaffer.store.properties.class=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.store.StoreProperties}]
 but was: 
  GraphSerialisable[config=GraphConfig[graphId=testGraphId,view=View[{
    "entities" : {
      "e1" : { }
    }
  }],library=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.store.library.NoGraphLibrary@56399b9e,hooks=[uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.hook.NamedViewResolver@34b9eb03, uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.hook.FunctionAuthoriser@43fda8d9]],schema=Schema[{
    "entities" : {
      "e1" : {
        "vertex" : "string"
      }
    },
    "types" : {
      "string" : {
        "class" : "java.lang.String"
      }
    }
  }],properties={gaffer.store.properties.class=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.store.StoreProperties, gaffer.store.class=uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.integration.store.TestStore}]
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
	at uk.gov.gchq.gaffer.graph.GraphSerialisableTest.shouldConsumeGraph(GraphSerialisableTest.java:98)
...

We can see that the two jsons differ due to the non-deterministic order of properties, [StoreProperties, TestStore].

Description of fix

The flakiness can be resolved by evaluating the assertion using the overridden equals of StoreProperties instead of GraphSerialisable. We continue to compare the config and schema the same way as before.

Maven logs for before and after the fix:
graphSerialisableTestFail.txt
graphSerialisableTestSuccess.txt

Logs for flakiness detected in first commit: graphSerialisableTestFail_516915ea4.txt

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.33%. Comparing base (ac60289) to head (e1e6289).
Report is 124 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #3156      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      66.34%   66.33%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity      2543     2541       -2     
=============================================
  Files            909      909              
  Lines          29026    29026              
  Branches        3225     3225              
=============================================
- Hits           19257    19253       -4     
- Misses          8333     8335       +2     
- Partials        1436     1438       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud