Resolve conflict with Meshtastic network #635
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, as far as I can see, Freifunk Cuxhaven is no longer active in the IC-VPN.
Meshtastic, also a mesh project, but with other goals, uses the range 10.115.0.0/16, in which the ICVPN range of Freifunk Cuxhaven is also located, when it tunnels IP. If Cuxhaven no longer needs the range, I would appreciate it if it could be released again so that no conflicts with the Meshtastic network can occur.
@Borsal Since you seem to be the maintainer of Cuxhaven, could you take a look at my request and reject or confirm it?