Skip to content

Conversation

@gfyrag
Copy link
Contributor

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Nov 20, 2025

No description provided.

@gfyrag gfyrag requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2025 13:48
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed the entire v1.0 versions block and incremented several ledger version strings in the regions chart README: versions.files."v2.2".ledger and versions.files."v3.0".ledger changed from v2.2.50v2.2.51; versions.files."v3.1".ledger and versions.files."v3.2-rc".ledger changed from v2.3.3v2.3.5.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Removed deprecated versions
charts/regions/README.md
Removed the entire v1.0 set of versions.files entries (deprecated block deleted).
Ledger version bumps
charts/regions/README.md
Updated ledger strings: versions.files."v2.2".ledger and versions.files."v3.0".ledger from "v2.2.50""v2.2.51"; versions.files."v3.1".ledger and versions.files."v3.2-rc".ledger from "v2.3.3""v2.3.5".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single-file, straightforward version removals and string updates; review focus:
    • Confirm intentional removal of the entire v1.0 block.
    • Verify the four ledger string increments are correct.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines of ledger lore,
Cleared an old corner, nudged versions four,
v1.0 now napping under moss and dew,
v2 and v3 wear brighter shoes anew,
A tiny tweak — a rabbit’s gentle cue.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess relevance to the changeset. Add a description explaining the purpose of the ledger version upgrades, affected blocks, and any breaking changes or migration notes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: upgrade ledger' accurately summarizes the main changes in the pull request, which involve upgrading ledger versions across multiple blocks.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/upgrade-ledger

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4eb034 and 9bc1212.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • charts/regions/values.schema.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • charts/regions/values.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • charts/regions/README.md (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • charts/regions/README.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gfyrag gfyrag force-pushed the chore/upgrade-ledger branch from a4eb034 to 9bc1212 Compare December 1, 2025 10:13
Copy link
Contributor

@Dav-14 Dav-14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you update the chart to mark the breaking changes ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants