Drop net-misc/bridge-utils

[Alivestars04]

bridge-utils has been marked deprecated by its upstream maintainers in favor of the bridge utility from iproute2, which Flatcar already ships via sys-apps/iproute2 (currently 6.16.0). Keeping a deprecated package in the image means carrying two Gentoo patches (a musl fix and an AR-variable fix) and an ebuild for tooling that upstream no longer recommends.

This removes the package from portage-stable, drops it from the coreos-base/coreos package list, and removes it from the portage-stable-packages-list used by the automated package update workflow, so the updater stops tracking it. The coreos-base/coreos revision symlink is bumped from -r320 to -r321 so the package is rebuilt.

This is a user-visible change: brctl will no longer be present in the image. Users invoking brctl in scripts or Ignition configs need to switch to ip link / bridge, e.g. ip link add br0 type bridge instead of brctl addbr br0. Given that, maintainers may prefer to time this against a specific release — happy to hold or re-target the branch.

Closes flatcar/Flatcar#638

How to use

Reviewers can confirm the removal is complete and correctly scoped:

1. No live references to the package remain in the tree (only the historical 2022 changelog entry, intentionally left as a release record):

   git grep -n bridge-utils
   

2. The replacement is present in the same image package list:

   git grep -n 'sys-apps/iproute2' sdk_container/src/third_party/coreos-overlay/coreos-base/coreos/coreos-0.0.1.ebuild
   

3. On a built image, verify brctl is gone and bridge/ip link still create bridges:

   command -v brctl            # expected: not found
   ip link add br0 type bridge && bridge link show && ip link del br0
   

Testing done

Verified statically in the tree; I have not built an SDK image locally, so the image-level checks below are left to CI.

• Confirmed the package existed only at sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/net-misc/bridge-utils/ and was referenced in exactly two live places (coreos-base/coreos/coreos-0.0.1.ebuild and .github/workflows/portage-stable-packages-list):

  $ git grep -n bridge-utils
  sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/changelog/updates/2022-02-23-update-pkgs-2015.md:1:- bridge-utils ([1.7.1](...))
  sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/net-misc/bridge-utils/metadata.xml:12: ...
  sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/net-misc/bridge-utils/Manifest:1: ...
  sdk_container/src/third_party/coreos-overlay/coreos-base/coreos/coreos-0.0.1.ebuild:139:  net-misc/bridge-utils
  .github/workflows/portage-stable-packages-list:561:net-misc/bridge-utils
  

• After the change, only the historical changelog entry remains:

  $ git grep -n bridge-utils
  sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/changelog/updates/2022-02-23-update-pkgs-2015.md:1:- bridge-utils ([1.7.1](...))
  

• Confirmed the replacement is shipped in the same image package list:

  $ git grep -n 'sys-apps/iproute2' .../coreos-base/coreos/coreos-0.0.1.ebuild
  165:  sys-apps/iproute2
  

• Confirmed no other package depends on it. The only RDEPEND in the removed ebuild was selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-brctl ), and sec-policy/selinux-brctl is not present in the tree, so nothing is orphaned.

• Confirmed the revision-symlink convention by checking the most recent commit to touch this ebuild (overlay coreos-base/coreos: add erofs-utils), which renamed coreos-0.0.1-r319.ebuild -> -r320.ebuild; this PR follows it with -r320 -> -r321.

• Changelog entries added in the respective changelog/ directory (user-facing change, bug fix, security fix, update)

• Inspected CI output for image differences: /boot and /usr size, packages, list files for any missing binaries, kernel modules, config files, kernel modules, etc. — will do once CI produces the image diff; expecting /usr/sbin/brctl to be the only binary removed

[Alivestars04]

please review!

cc @krnowak @pothos @chewi

[LexiNadolski]

@Alivestars04 Do not tag maintainers for reviews like this. This is not the way to operate in this project. If you cannot follow these standards, you will be removed.

[dongsupark]

Definitely +1 on dropping bridge-utils, because it has been deprecated long time ago.
However the comment in the original issue is still valid. Folks still have habit of running brctl.
Therefore I would say this needs at least small deprecation announcement for several months.

Anyway I will try to run Jenkins CI with this PR.

[dongsupark]

I think this PR is ready to merge.
~6 months of promotion from main to stable would be already okay for deprecation period.

[dongsupark]

Can you please add ([Flatcar#638](https://github.com/flatcar/Flatcar/issues/638)) at the end?

- Removed the `net-misc/bridge-utils` package. It is deprecated upstream in favor of the `bridge` utility from iproute2, which Flatcar ships through `sys-apps/iproute2`. Use `ip link add ... type bridge` instead of `brctl addbr ...`. ([Flatcar#638](https://github.com/flatcar/Flatcar/issues/638))