Skip to content

Document k8saudit webhook backend placement tradeoffs - #1578

Open
devilking7x wants to merge 1 commit into
falcosecurity:mainfrom
devilking7x:docs-k8saudit-webhook-placement
Open

devilking7x wants to merge 1 commit into
falcosecurity:mainfrom
devilking7x:docs-k8saudit-webhook-placement

Conversation

@devilking7x

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documents the webhook backend placement tradeoffs for the k8saudit plugin (inside vs. outside the audited cluster), per the discussion in #1457. Also corrects the Requirements text, which described the example config as targeting "an external HTTP API" when it actually uses an in-cluster service IP.

Closes #1457

Add a 'Webhook Backend Placement' section to the k8saudit README
documenting the tradeoffs of hosting the webhook backend inside vs.
outside the audited cluster, per the discussion in falcosecurity#1457.

Also fix the Requirements text: the webhook-config.yaml.in example
points at an in-cluster service IP, not an external HTTP API.

Signed-off-by: Mohd Raja <devilhac143@gmail.com>
@poiana

poiana commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: devilking7x
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign leogr for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana
poiana requested review from LucaGuerra and irozzo-1A October 8, 2026 15:22
@poiana poiana added the size/S label Oct 8, 2026
@devilking7x
devilking7x force-pushed the docs-k8saudit-webhook-placement branch from 6b4b576 to b4970b1 Compare October 8, 2026 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[k8saudit] Documentation clarification regarding audit webhook backend

2 participants